Suppr超能文献

葡萄牙家庭医生实施的预防性健康服务——基于两种临床场景的横断面研究

Preventive health services implemented by family physicians in Portugal-a cross-sectional study based on two clinical scenarios.

作者信息

Martins Carlos, Azevedo Luís Filipe, Santos Cristina, Sá Luísa, Santos Paulo, Couto Maria, Pereira Altamiro, Hespanhol Alberto

机构信息

Family Medicine Unit, Social Sciences and Health Department of the Faculty of Medicine of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Information Sciences and Decision on Health Department (CIDES), Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems (CINTESIS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2014 May 26;4(5):e005162. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005162.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether Portuguese family physicians perform preventive health services in accordance with scientific evidence, based on the recommendations of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Primary healthcare, Portuguese National Health Service.

PARTICIPANTS

255 Portuguese family physicians selected by a stratified cluster sampling design were invited to participate in a computer-assisted telephone survey.

OUTCOMES

Prevalence of compliance with USPSTF recommendations for screening, given a male and female clinical scenario and a set of proposed medical interventions, including frequency of the intervention and performance in their own daily practice.

RESULTS

A response rate of 95.7% was obtained (n=244). 98-100% of family physicians answered according to the USPSTF recommendations in most interventions. In the male scenario, the lowest concordance was observed in the evaluation of prostate-specific antigen with 37% of family physicians answering according to the USPSTF recommendations. In the female scenario, the lowest concordance was for cholesterol testing with 2% of family physicians complying. Family physicians younger than 50 years had significantly better compliance scores than older ones (mean 77% vs 72%; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found a high degree of agreement with USPSTF recommendations among Portuguese family physicians. However, we also found results suggesting excessive use of some medical interventions, raising concerns related to possible harm associated with overdiagnosis and overtreatment.

摘要

目的

根据美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)的建议,评估葡萄牙家庭医生是否按照科学证据提供预防性健康服务。

设计

横断面研究。

背景

葡萄牙国家卫生服务体系的初级医疗保健。

参与者

通过分层整群抽样设计选取的255名葡萄牙家庭医生受邀参加一项计算机辅助电话调查。

结果

针对男性和女性临床情景以及一系列拟议的医疗干预措施(包括干预频率及其在日常实践中的执行情况),符合USPSTF筛查建议的比例。

结果

获得了95.7%的回复率(n = 244)。在大多数干预措施中,98%至100%的家庭医生按照USPSTF的建议作答。在男性情景中,前列腺特异性抗原评估的一致性最低,只有37%的家庭医生按照USPSTF的建议作答。在女性情景中,胆固醇检测的一致性最低,只有2%的家庭医生符合要求。50岁以下的家庭医生的依从性得分显著高于年长的医生(平均77%对72%;p<0.001)。

结论

我们发现葡萄牙家庭医生对USPSTF的建议高度认同。然而,我们也发现结果表明某些医疗干预措施存在过度使用的情况,这引发了对过度诊断和过度治疗可能带来的危害的担忧。

相似文献

4
Clinical preventive services in Guatemala: a cross-sectional survey of internal medicine physicians.
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048640. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
6
Screening for Alcohol Misuse: Practices Among U.S. Primary Care Providers, DocStyles 2016.
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Feb;54(2):173-180. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.11.008. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
10
Physician adherence to U.S. Preventive Services Task Force mammography guidelines.
Womens Health Issues. 2014 May-Jun;24(3):e313-9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.03.003.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantification of harms in cancer screening trials: literature review.
BMJ. 2013 Sep 16;347:f5334. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5334.
2
Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence.
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 22;367(21):1998-2005. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1206809.
3
Preventing overdiagnosis: how to stop harming the healthy.
BMJ. 2012 May 28;344:e3502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3502.
4
Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program.
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Apr 3;156(7):491-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-7-201204030-00005.
5
[Family Health Reform in Portugal: analysis of its implementation].
Cien Saude Colet. 2011 Jun;16(6):2853-63. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232011000600023.
8
Is clinical prevention better than cure?
Lancet. 2008 Dec 6;372(9654):1997-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61843-7.
9
Physician awareness of diagnostic and nondrug therapeutic costs: a systematic review.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008 Spring;24(2):158-65. doi: 10.1017/S0266462308080227.
10
Use and costs of nonrecommended tests during routine preventive health exams.
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Jun;30(6):521-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.02.003.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验