Suppr超能文献

通过频域和时域光学相干断层扫描计算预测的视网膜厚度——不同方法的比较

Calculating the predicted retinal thickness from spectral domain and time domain optical coherence tomography - comparison of different methods.

作者信息

Tan Colin S, Li Kelvin Z, Lim Tock Han

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, 308433, Singapore,

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;252(9):1491-9. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2672-9. Epub 2014 May 27.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracy of different methods of calculating predicted central retinal thickness values in order to allow comparison between results of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and time-domain OCT (TD-OCT) devices.

METHODS

In a prospective cohort study, 100 consecutive healthy individuals without ocular disease underwent sequential scanning with SD-OCT (Spectralis OCT) and TD-OCT (Stratus OCT). A group of 60 eyes was used to generate the conversion equations, which were tested on the remaining 140 eyes. Four equations were used: 1. Mean difference between SD-OCT and TD-OCT; 2. Multiplying a ratio by the original retinal thickness; 3. Linear regression analysis using retinal thickness; and 4. Regression analysis using retinal thickness and spherical equivalent. All four methods were used to calculate predicted SD-OCT values from TD-OCT measurements, and vice versa.

RESULTS

For all four equations, the predicted SD-OCT central retinal thickness values were similar to the actual SD-OCT, with mean difference ranging from 0.78 to 1.01 μm, and intraclass correlation coefficients >0.88. Both regression equations and mean difference showed greater accuracy, with variation between calculated and actual retinal thickness values ≤5 μm in 60% of eyes. In contrast, the ratio method was less accurate, with 15.8 % of eyes showing differences >15 μm. Similar results were found for predicted TD-OCT values.

CONCLUSIONS

Several methods can be used to convert central retinal thickness values from SD-OCT to the predicted TD-OCT value, or vice versa, with high degrees of accuracy and reliability. These methods may allow comparison of OCT values from SD-OCT and TD-OCT devices in clinical trials and standard patient care.

摘要

目的

比较不同计算预测中心视网膜厚度值方法的准确性,以便能在光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD - OCT)和时域光学相干断层扫描(TD - OCT)设备的结果之间进行比较。

方法

在一项前瞻性队列研究中,100名连续的无眼部疾病的健康个体先后接受了SD - OCT(Spectralis OCT)和TD - OCT(Stratus OCT)扫描。一组60只眼用于生成转换方程,并在其余140只眼上进行测试。使用了四个方程:1. SD - OCT与TD - OCT之间的平均差值;2. 用一个比率乘以原始视网膜厚度;3. 使用视网膜厚度进行线性回归分析;4. 使用视网膜厚度和球镜等效度进行回归分析。所有四种方法都用于从TD - OCT测量值计算预测的SD - OCT值,反之亦然。

结果

对于所有四个方程,预测的SD - OCT中心视网膜厚度值与实际的SD - OCT值相似,平均差值在0.78至1.01μm之间,组内相关系数>0.88。回归方程和平均差值都显示出更高的准确性,60%的眼睛计算得到的视网膜厚度值与实际值之间的差异≤5μm。相比之下,比率法准确性较低,15.8%的眼睛差异>15μm。对于预测的TD - OCT值也发现了类似结果。

结论

有几种方法可用于将中心视网膜厚度值从SD - OCT转换为预测的TD - OCT值,反之亦然,具有高度的准确性和可靠性。这些方法可在临床试验和标准患者护理中对SD - OCT和TD - OCT设备的OCT值进行比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验