• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较多种谱域光学相干断层扫描仪手动校正的视网膜厚度测量值。

Comparison of manually corrected retinal thickness measurements from multiple spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments.

机构信息

Doheny Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA.

出版信息

Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;96(3):380-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2010.201111. Epub 2011 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1136/bjo.2010.201111
PMID:21733920
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare retinal thickness measurements from three different spectral domain optical coherence instruments when manual segmentation is employed to standardise retinal boundary locations.

METHODS

40 eyes of 21 healthy subjects were scanned on the Cirrus HD-OCT, Topcon 3D-OCT-2000 and Heidelberg Spectralis-OCT. Raw data were imported into custom grading software (3D-OCTOR). Manual segmentation was performed on every data set, and retinal thickness values in the foveal central subfield were computed.

RESULTS

37 eyes of 20 subjects were gradable on every machine. The average retinal thicknesses for these eyes were 236.7 μm (SD 20.1), 235.7 μm (SD 20.4) and 236.5 μm (SD 18.0) for the Cirrus, 3D-OCT-2000 and Spectralis, respectively. Comparing manual retinal thickness measurements between any two machines, the maximum difference was 18.2 μm. The mean absolute differences per eye between two machines were: 4.9 μm for Cirrus versus 3D-OCT-2000, 3.7 μm for Cirrus versus Spectralis and 4.4 μm for 3D-OCT-2000 versus Spectralis.

CONCLUSIONS

When a uniform position is used to locate the outer retinal boundary, the retinal thickness measurements derived from three different spectral domain optical coherence instruments devices are virtually identical. Manual correction may allow OCT-derived thickness measurements to be compared between devices in clinical trials and clinical research.

摘要

背景/目的:比较三种不同的谱域光相干断层扫描仪在采用手动分割以标准化视网膜边界位置时的视网膜厚度测量值。

方法

21 名健康受试者的 40 只眼分别在 Cirrus HD-OCT、Topcon 3D-OCT-2000 和 Heidelberg Spectralis-OCT 上进行扫描。原始数据被导入定制的分级软件(3D-OCTOR)。对每个数据集进行手动分割,并计算中心凹中央子区的视网膜厚度值。

结果

20 名受试者中有 37 只眼可以在每台机器上分级。这些眼睛的平均视网膜厚度分别为 236.7μm(SD 20.1)、235.7μm(SD 20.4)和 236.5μm(SD 18.0),分别来自 Cirrus、3D-OCT-2000 和 Spectralis。比较任意两台机器之间的手动视网膜厚度测量值,最大差异为 18.2μm。两台机器之间每只眼睛的平均绝对差异分别为:Cirrus 与 3D-OCT-2000 之间为 4.9μm,Cirrus 与 Spectralis 之间为 3.7μm,3D-OCT-2000 与 Spectralis 之间为 4.4μm。

结论

当使用统一的位置来定位外视网膜边界时,来自三种不同的谱域光相干断层扫描仪设备的视网膜厚度测量值几乎完全相同。手动校正可能允许在临床试验和临床研究中比较 OCT 衍生的厚度测量值。

相似文献

1
Comparison of manually corrected retinal thickness measurements from multiple spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments.比较多种谱域光学相干断层扫描仪手动校正的视网膜厚度测量值。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Mar;96(3):380-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2010.201111. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
2
Macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using six different optical coherence tomography instruments.使用六种不同光学相干断层扫描仪器对健康眼睛进行黄斑厚度测量。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Jul;50(7):3432-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2970. Epub 2009 Feb 21.
3
Do different spectral domain OCT hardwares measure the same? Comparison of retinal thickness using third-party software.不同的光谱域光学相干断层扫描(OCT)硬件测量结果相同吗?使用第三方软件比较视网膜厚度。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Nov;253(11):1915-21. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3075-2. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
4
A novel technique of adjusting segmentation boundary layers to achieve comparability of retinal thickness and volumes between spectral domain and time domain optical coherence tomography.一种调整分段边界层的新方法,以实现频域和时域光相干断层扫描之间视网膜厚度和体积的可比性。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Aug 13;53(9):5515-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9868.
5
Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness reproducibility using seven different OCT instruments.使用七种不同的 OCT 仪器测量视网膜神经纤维层厚度的可重复性。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Aug 31;53(9):5912-20. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8644.
6
Comparison of retinal thickness in normal eyes using Stratus and Spectralis optical coherence tomography.应用 Stratus 和 Spectralis 光学相干断层扫描仪比较正常眼的视网膜厚度。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 May;51(5):2644-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4774. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
7
Comparison of foveal microstructure imaging with different spectral domain optical coherence tomography machines.不同谱域光相干断层扫描仪的黄斑区微观结构成像比较。
Ophthalmology. 2012 Nov;119(11):2319-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
8
Comparisons of choroidal thickness of normal eyes obtained by two different spectral-domain OCT instruments and one swept-source OCT instrument.两种不同的谱域 OCT 仪器和一种扫频源 OCT 仪器测量正常眼脉络膜厚度的比较。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Nov 19;54(12):7630-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13135.
9
Retinal thickness analysis with time and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Cross-platform interchangeability of manual measurements.基于时间和光谱域光学相干断层扫描的视网膜厚度分析。手动测量的跨平台互换性。
Acta Biomed. 2011 Dec;82(3):244-50.
10
Effects of changing operators and instruments on time-domain and spectral-domain OCT measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.更换操作人员和仪器对视网膜神经纤维层厚度的时域和频域光学相干断层扫描测量结果的影响。
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2011 Jul-Aug;42(4):328-37. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20110603-05.

引用本文的文献

1
Standardized conversion model for retinal thickness measurements between spectral-domain and swept-source optical coherence tomography based on machine learning.基于机器学习的光谱域与扫频源光学相干断层扫描视网膜厚度测量的标准化转换模型
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025 Jul 17;13:1612455. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1612455. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of retinal thickness measurements among four different optical coherence tomography devices.四种不同光学相干断层扫描仪测量视网膜厚度的比较。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 12;14(1):3560. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54109-6.
3
A Systematic Prospective Comparison of Fluid Volume Evaluation across OCT Devices Used in Clinical Practice.
临床实践中使用的不同光学相干断层扫描(OCT)设备对液体量评估的系统前瞻性比较
Ophthalmol Sci. 2023 Dec 15;4(3):100456. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100456. eCollection 2024 May-Jun.
4
Conversion of Central Subfield Thickness Measurements of Diabetic Macular Edema Across Cirrus and Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Instruments.糖尿病性黄斑水肿的中央凹视网膜厚度测量值在 Cirrus 和 Spectralis 光学相干断层扫描仪之间的转换。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Dec 1;10(14):34. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.14.34.
5
Comparison between two multimodal imaging platforms: Nidek Mirante and Heidelberg Spectralis.两种多模态成像平台的比较:尼德克 Mirante 与海德堡 Spectralis。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul;259(7):1791-1802. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-05050-7. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
6
Repeatability and Reproducibility of Axial and Lateral Measurements on Handheld Optical Coherence Tomography Systems Compared with Tabletop System.手持式光学相干断层扫描仪轴向和侧向测量的重复性和再现性与台式系统的比较。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Oct 21;9(11):25. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.11.25. eCollection 2020 Oct.
7
Comparing Macular Thickness Measurements in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema with the Optos Spectral OCT/SLO and Heidelberg Spectralis HRA + OCT.使用Optos光谱光学相干断层扫描/扫描激光眼底镜和海德堡Spectralis HRA + OCT比较糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的黄斑厚度测量值
Vision (Basel). 2016 Apr 12;1(1):2. doi: 10.3390/vision1010002.
8
Validation of Optical Coherence Tomography Retinal Segmentation in Neurodegenerative Disease.光学相干断层扫描视网膜分割在神经退行性疾病中的验证
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019 Sep 11;8(5):6. doi: 10.1167/tvst.8.5.6. eCollection 2019 Sep.
9
Effect of Macular Vascular Density on Central Visual Function and Macular Structure in Glaucoma Patients.青光眼患者黄斑血管密度对中心视觉功能和黄斑结构的影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 30;8(1):16009. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34417-4.
10
Corneal, Scleral, Choroidal, and Foveal Thickness in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者的角膜、巩膜、脉络膜和中央凹厚度
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;47(6):315-319. doi: 10.4274/tjo.58712. Epub 2017 Dec 25.