• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Spectral- and time-domain optical coherence tomography measurements of macular thickness in normal eyes and in eyes with diabetic macular edema.正常眼和糖尿病性黄斑水肿眼中黄斑厚度的光谱域和时域光相干断层扫描测量。
Eye (Lond). 2012 Mar;26(3):454-62. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.293. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
2
Comparison of Macular Thickness Measurements Using Swept-Source and Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Healthy and Diabetic Subjects.应用扫频源和谱域光学相干断层扫描在健康人和糖尿病患者中测量黄斑厚度的比较。
Curr Eye Res. 2021 Oct;46(10):1567-1573. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2021.1908566. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
3
Reproducibility of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography retinal thickness measurements and conversion to equivalent time-domain metrics in diabetic macular edema.糖尿病性黄斑水肿中光谱域光学相干断层扫描视网膜厚度测量的可重复性及向等效时域指标的转换
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;132(9):1113-22. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.1698.
4
Optical coherence tomography for the detection of early macular edema in diabetic patients with retinopathy.光学相干断层扫描用于检测糖尿病视网膜病变患者的早期黄斑水肿。
Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2010 Jan-Mar;52(1):40-8.
5
Effects of Diabetic Macular Edema on Repeatability of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements at the Macular and Peripapillary Area Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography.糖尿病性黄斑水肿对使用扫频光学相干断层扫描测量黄斑和视乳头周围区域视网膜神经纤维层厚度重复性的影响。
Curr Eye Res. 2017 Feb;42(2):307-314. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2016.1170855. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
6
Evaluation of time domain and spectral domain optical coherence tomography in the measurement of diabetic macular edema.时域和频域光学相干断层扫描在糖尿病性黄斑水肿测量中的评估
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Oct;49(10):4290-6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2113. Epub 2008 May 30.
7
Diagnostic Utility of Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometry and Fundus Photographs Compared to Spectral Domain OCT in Center-Involving Diabetic Macular Edema.基于扫频源光学相干断层扫描的生物测量和眼底照片与光谱域光学相干断层扫描在累及黄斑中心的糖尿病性黄斑水肿中的诊断效用比较
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2025 Feb;32(1):95-102. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2024.2338824. Epub 2024 May 6.
8
Repeatability of Spectralis OCT measurements of macular thickness and volume in diabetic macular edema.频域光学相干断层扫描仪(Spectralis OCT)测量糖尿病性黄斑水肿黄斑厚度和体积的重复性。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Nov 21;53(12):7754-9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10895.
9
Comparison of Retinal Layer Thickness in Eyes with Resolved Diabetic Macular Edema Receiving Ranibizumab with Normal Eyes.比较接受雷珠单抗治疗后糖尿病黄斑水肿消退眼与正常眼视网膜各层厚度。
Ophthalmologica. 2020;243(1):27-36. doi: 10.1159/000503326. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
10
Reproducibility of diabetic macular edema estimates from SD-OCT is affected by the choice of image analysis algorithm.从 SD-OCT 获得的糖尿病性黄斑水肿估计的可重复性受到图像分析算法选择的影响。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jun 19;54(6):4184-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10420.

引用本文的文献

1
Standardized conversion model for retinal thickness measurements between spectral-domain and swept-source optical coherence tomography based on machine learning.基于机器学习的光谱域与扫频源光学相干断层扫描视网膜厚度测量的标准化转换模型
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025 Jul 17;13:1612455. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1612455. eCollection 2025.
2
How early can we detect diabetic retinopathy? A narrative review of imaging tools for structural assessment of the retina.我们能多早检测出糖尿病性视网膜病变?关于视网膜结构评估成像工具的叙述性综述。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 May 16. doi: 10.1007/s00417-025-06828-3.
3
Agreement of Anterior Segment Parameter Measurements With CASIA 2 and IOLMaster 700.眼前节参数测量结果与CASIA 2和IOLMaster 700的一致性。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 11;9:777443. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.777443. eCollection 2022.
4
Phosphorylation of cyclophilin D at serine 191 regulates mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening and cell death after ischemia-reperfusion.丝氨酸 191 位点磷酸化环孢素 D 调节缺血再灌注后线粒体通透性转换孔的开放和细胞死亡。
Cell Death Dis. 2020 Aug 19;11(8):661. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-02864-5.
5
Genetic biomarkers in the VEGF pathway predicting response to anti-VEGF therapy in age-related macular degeneration.血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)通路中的遗传生物标志物预测年龄相关性黄斑变性对抗VEGF治疗的反应
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec 17;4(1):e000273. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000273. eCollection 2019.
6
Primary outcomes of the VIDI study: phase 2, double-masked, randomized, active-controlled study of ASP8232 for diabetic macular edema.VIDI研究的主要结局:ASP8232治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的2期双盲、随机、活性药物对照研究。
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2019 Aug 1;5:28. doi: 10.1186/s40942-019-0178-7. eCollection 2019.
7
Diabetic macular edema: Evidence-based management.糖尿病性黄斑水肿:循证管理。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;66(12):1736-1750. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1240_18.
8
Comment on "Assessment of the long-term visual and anatomical outcomes of ranibizumab to treat neovascular age-related macular degeneration".关于“雷珠单抗治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的长期视力和解剖学结果评估”的评论
Int J Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov 18;11(11):1884-1886. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.11.25. eCollection 2018.
9
Incidence and risk factors for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in the fellow eye.对侧眼中新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的发病率及危险因素
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;256(11):2061-2068. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4100-z. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
10
Agreement of Anterior Segment Parameters Obtained From Swept-Source Fourier-Domain and Time-Domain Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.扫频源傅里叶域和时域眼前节光学相干断层扫描获得的眼前节参数的一致性。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Mar 1;59(3):1554-1561. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-23574.

本文引用的文献

1
Retinal thickness and volume measurements in diabetic macular edema: a comparison of four optical coherence tomography systems.糖尿病性黄斑水肿的视网膜厚度和容积测量:四种光学相干断层扫描系统的比较。
Retina. 2011 Jan;31(1):48-55. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181e095a4.
2
Comparison of retinal thickness in normal eyes using Stratus and Spectralis optical coherence tomography.应用 Stratus 和 Spectralis 光学相干断层扫描仪比较正常眼的视网膜厚度。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 May;51(5):2644-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4774. Epub 2009 Dec 10.
3
Sensitivity advantage of swept source and Fourier domain optical coherence tomography.扫频光源和傅里叶域光学相干断层扫描的灵敏度优势。
Opt Express. 2003 Sep 8;11(18):2183-9. doi: 10.1364/oe.11.002183.
4
Performance of fourier domain vs. time domain optical coherence tomography.傅里叶域与时间域光学相干断层扫描的性能比较
Opt Express. 2003 Apr 21;11(8):889-94. doi: 10.1364/oe.11.000889.
5
Normative data for macular thickness by high-definition spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (spectralis).高清光谱域光学相干断层扫描(Spectralis)测量黄斑厚度的正常参考值。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Aug;148(2):266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.03.006. Epub 2009 May 9.
6
Correlation in foveal thickness measurements between spectral-domain and time-domain optical coherence tomography in normal individuals.正常人眼中心凹厚度的频域和时域光学相干断层扫描测量的相关性。
Eye (Lond). 2010 Feb;24(2):251-8. doi: 10.1038/eye.2009.76. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
7
Macular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using six different optical coherence tomography instruments.使用六种不同光学相干断层扫描仪器对健康眼睛进行黄斑厚度测量。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Jul;50(7):3432-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2970. Epub 2009 Feb 21.
8
Comparison of spectral- and time-domain optical coherence tomography for retinal thickness measurements in healthy and diseased eyes.光谱域和时域光学相干断层扫描技术在健康和患病眼睛视网膜厚度测量中的比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 May;147(5):847-58, 858.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.11.019. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
9
Comparison of time domain Stratus OCT and spectral domain SLO/OCT for assessment of macular thickness and volume.时域 Stratus OCT 与频域 SLO/OCT 评估黄斑厚度和体积的比较。
Eye (Lond). 2009 Nov;23(11):2071-8. doi: 10.1038/eye.2008.363. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
10
Prospective comparison of cirrus and stratus optical coherence tomography for quantifying retinal thickness.Cirrus和Stratus光学相干断层扫描技术在定量测量视网膜厚度方面的前瞻性比较。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Feb;147(2):267-275.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.08.018. Epub 2008 Oct 17.

正常眼和糖尿病性黄斑水肿眼中黄斑厚度的光谱域和时域光相干断层扫描测量。

Spectral- and time-domain optical coherence tomography measurements of macular thickness in normal eyes and in eyes with diabetic macular edema.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2012 Mar;26(3):454-62. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.293. Epub 2011 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1038/eye.2011.293
PMID:22134597
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3298977/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To report macular thickness values in normal eyes and eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) using time-domain (TD) and spectral-domain (SD) optical coherence tomography (OCT), and to derive a conversion equation.

METHODS

The index study was a prospective investigation conducted on 80 eyes from 40 normal subjects and 130 eyes from 118 patients with DME seen in our clinic. Retinal thickness values from the central 1 mm of the macula and surrounding four ETDRS subfields were acquired using TD-OCT (Stratus OCT) and SD-OCT (SPECTRALIS HRA+OCT). Measurements of the central (C) subfield from both devices were used to derive a conversion equation. The equation was used to predict SD-OCT values using measurements from TD-OCT. Agreement between predicted and actual SD-OCT measurements was assessed.

RESULTS

In normal eyes, the mean difference between TD-OCT and SD-OCT measurements of the C subfield was 76 μm (CI(95)=74 and 77, respectively). The conversion equation, y=1.029x+72.49, was derived. In eyes with DME, using the equation, SPECTRALIS-predicted values were 5% higher than actual measurements, with 95% of predicted values falling within 9% of the actual measurements. Relocating SD-OCT grids to match the location on TD-OCT resulted in predicted values falling within 7% of actual measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The percent difference between actual thickness measurements from SPECTRALIS and predicted thickness measurements, using the conversion equation, was within reported limits of repeatability of Stratus in eyes with DME. Our equation may help correlate OCT values from both devices in standard care and clinical trials for DME.

摘要

目的

利用时域(TD)和频域(SD)光学相干断层扫描(OCT)报告正常眼和糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)眼中的黄斑厚度值,并推导出转换方程。

方法

本研究为前瞻性研究,纳入 40 名正常受试者的 80 只眼和我们诊所就诊的 118 例 DME 患者的 130 只眼。使用 TD-OCT(Stratus OCT)和 SD-OCT(SPECTRALIS HRA+OCT)获取黄斑中央 1mm 及周围四个 ETDRS 亚区的视网膜厚度值。使用两种设备的中央(C)亚区的测量值推导出转换方程。该方程用于根据 TD-OCT 的测量值预测 SD-OCT 值。评估预测和实际 SD-OCT 测量值之间的一致性。

结果

在正常眼中,C 亚区的 TD-OCT 和 SD-OCT 测量值之间的平均差异为 76μm(CI(95)分别为 74 和 77μm)。推导出转换方程 y=1.029x+72.49。在 DME 眼中,使用该方程,SPECTRALIS 预测值比实际测量值高 5%,95%的预测值落在实际测量值的 9%以内。将 SD-OCT 网格重新定位以匹配 TD-OCT 的位置,使预测值落在实际测量值的 7%以内。

结论

使用转换方程,SPECTRALIS 的实际厚度测量值与预测厚度测量值之间的差异百分比在 DME 眼中 Stratus 报告的可重复性范围内。我们的方程可帮助在标准护理和 DME 的临床试验中关联两种设备的 OCT 值。