Ridker Paul M, Lüscher Thomas F
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 900 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215 USA Division of Preventive Medicine, Center for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 900 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215 USA
Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich and Center for Molecular Cardiology, Campus Schlieren, University Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jul 14;35(27):1782-91. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu203. Epub 2014 May 26.
Atherothrombosis is no longer considered solely a disorder of lipoprotein accumulation in the arterial wall. Rather, the initiation and progression of atherosclerotic lesions is currently understood to have major inflammatory influences that encompass components of both the innate and acquired immune systems. Promising clinical data for 'upstream' biomarkers of inflammation such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) as well as 'downstream' biomarkers such as C-reactive protein, observations regarding cholesterol crystals as an activator of the IL-1β generating inflammasome, and recent Mendelian randomization data for the IL-6 receptor support the hypothesis that inflammatory mediators of atherosclerosis may converge on the central IL-1, tumour necrosis factor (TNF-α), IL-6 signalling pathway. On this basis, emerging anti-inflammatory approaches to vascular protection can be categorized into two broad groups, those that target the central IL-6 inflammatory signalling pathway and those that do not. Large-scale Phase III trials are now underway with agents that lead to marked reductions in IL-6 and C-reactive protein (such as canakinumab and methotrexate) as well as with agents that impact on diverse non-IL-6-dependent pathways (such as varespladib and darapladib). Both approaches have the potential to benefit patients and reduce vascular events. However, care should be taken when interpreting these trials as outcomes for agents that target IL-6 signalling are unlikely to be informative for therapies that target alternative pathways, and vice versa. As the inflammatory system is redundant, compensatory, and crucial for survival, evaluation of risks as well as benefits must drive the development of agents in this class.
动脉粥样硬化血栓形成不再仅仅被视为动脉壁中脂蛋白积累的一种病症。相反,目前认为动脉粥样硬化病变的起始和进展具有主要的炎症影响,涉及先天免疫系统和后天免疫系统的组成部分。诸如白细胞介素-6(IL-6)等炎症“上游”生物标志物以及诸如C反应蛋白等“下游”生物标志物的有前景的临床数据、关于胆固醇晶体作为生成IL-1β的炎性小体激活剂的观察结果,以及最近关于IL-6受体的孟德尔随机化数据,均支持动脉粥样硬化的炎症介质可能汇聚于核心的IL-1、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF-α)、IL-6信号通路这一假说。在此基础上,新兴的血管保护抗炎方法可分为两大类,即靶向核心IL-6炎症信号通路的方法和不靶向该通路的方法。目前正在进行大规模III期试验,试验药物包括可导致IL-6和C反应蛋白显著降低的药物(如卡那单抗和甲氨蝶呤)以及影响多种非IL-6依赖性途径的药物(如伐瑞普拉迪和达拉普拉迪)。这两种方法都有可能使患者受益并减少血管事件。然而,在解释这些试验时应谨慎,因为靶向IL-6信号的药物的结果对于靶向替代途径的疗法不太可能提供有用信息,反之亦然。由于炎症系统具有冗余性、代偿性且对生存至关重要,对这类药物的研发必须权衡风险和益处。