• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同数据源的质量测量结果存在差异。

Variation in outcomes of quality measurement by data source.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2014 Jun;133(6):e1676-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-4277.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2013-4277
PMID:24864178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4918742/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate selected Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act claims-based quality measures using claims data alone, electronic health record (EHR) data alone, and both data sources combined.

METHODS

Our population included pediatric patients from 46 clinics in the OCHIN network of community health centers, who were continuously enrolled in Oregon's public health insurance program during 2010. Within this population, we calculated selected pediatric care quality measures according to the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act technical specifications within administrative claims. We then calculated these measures in the same cohort, by using EHR data, by using the technical specifications plus clinical data previously shown to enhance capture of a given measure. We used the k statistic to determine agreement in measurement when using claims versus EHR data. Finally, we measured quality of care delivered to the study population, when using a combined dataset of linked, patient-level administrative claims and EHR data.

RESULTS

When using administrative claims data, 1.0% of children (aged 3-17) had a BMI percentile recorded, compared with 71.9% based on the EHR data (k agreement [k] # 0.01), and 72.0% in the combined dataset. Among children turning 2 in 2010, 20.2% received all recommended immunizations according to the administrative claims data, 17.2% according to the EHR data (k = 0.82), and 21.4% according to the combined dataset.

CONCLUSIONS

Children's care quality measures may not be accurate when assessed using only administrative claims. Adding EHR data to administrative claims data may yield more complete measurement.

摘要

目的

仅使用索赔数据、电子健康记录 (EHR) 数据或两者结合来评估《儿童健康保险计划再授权法案》(Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act,CHIPRA)选定的基于索赔的质量措施。

方法

我们的研究人群包括来自 OCHIN 网络中 46 家社区卫生中心的儿科患者,这些患者在 2010 年期间持续参加俄勒冈州的公共健康保险计划。在该人群中,我们根据《儿童健康保险计划再授权法案》的技术规范,在管理索赔中计算了选定的儿科保健质量措施。然后,我们使用 EHR 数据,根据技术规范以及先前被证明可增强特定措施捕获的临床数据,在同一队列中计算了这些措施。我们使用 k 统计量来确定使用索赔数据与 EHR 数据进行测量时的一致性。最后,我们使用链接的患者级管理索赔和 EHR 数据的综合数据集,来衡量向研究人群提供的医疗服务质量。

结果

使用管理索赔数据时,有 1.0%(年龄 3-17 岁)的儿童记录了 BMI 百分位数,而基于 EHR 数据的比例为 71.9%(k 一致性 [k]#0.01),在综合数据集则为 72.0%。在 2010 年满 2 岁的儿童中,根据管理索赔数据,有 20.2%的儿童接受了所有推荐的免疫接种,根据 EHR 数据则为 17.2%(k=0.82),根据综合数据集则为 21.4%。

结论

仅使用管理索赔数据评估时,儿童保健质量措施可能不准确。将 EHR 数据添加到管理索赔数据中可能会得到更完整的测量结果。

相似文献

1
Variation in outcomes of quality measurement by data source.不同数据源的质量测量结果存在差异。
Pediatrics. 2014 Jun;133(6):e1676-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-4277.
2
Comparison of Electronic Health Record-Based and Claims-Based Diabetes Care Quality Measures: Causes of Discrepancies.基于电子健康记录和理赔的糖尿病护理质量衡量指标的比较:差异的原因。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):2988-3006. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12819. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
3
Feasibility of evaluating the CHIPRA care quality measures in electronic health record data.评估 CHIPRA 护理质量措施在电子健康记录数据中的可行性。
Pediatrics. 2012 Jul;130(1):139-49. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3705. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
4
Linkage methods for connecting children with parents in electronic health record and state public health insurance data.电子健康记录和州公共医疗保险数据中用于将儿童与父母关联的方法。
Matern Child Health J. 2014 Nov;18(9):2025-33. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1453-8.
5
Measuring quality in pediatrics: Florida's early experiences with the CHIPRA core measure set.衡量儿科医疗质量:佛罗里达州采用儿童健康保险计划再授权法案核心指标集的早期经验。
Matern Child Health J. 2014 Aug;18(6):1300-7. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1379-6.
6
Agreement and validity of electronic health record prescribing data relative to pharmacy claims data: A validation study from a US electronic health record database.电子健康记录处方数据与药房报销数据的一致性及有效性:一项来自美国电子健康记录数据库的验证研究
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Aug;26(8):963-972. doi: 10.1002/pds.4234. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
7
Current Challenges of Using Patient-Level Claims and Electronic Health Record Data for the Longitudinal Evaluation of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Outcomes.使用患者级别的索赔和电子健康记录数据对杜氏肌营养不良症结果进行纵向评估所面临的当前挑战。
Adv Ther. 2024 Sep;41(9):3615-3632. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02897-8. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
8
Agreement of Medicaid claims and electronic health records for assessing preventive care quality among adults.评估成年人预防保健质量的医疗补助索赔和电子健康记录的一致性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):720-4. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002333. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
9
Medicaid Statistical Information System (MSIS): a data source for quality reporting for Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP).医疗补助统计信息系统(MSIS):医疗补助和儿童健康保险计划(CHIP)质量报告的数据源。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2011 Apr 1;8(Spring):1d.
10
The Method for Performance Measurement Matters: Diabetes Care Quality as Measured by Administrative Claims and Institutional Registry.绩效衡量方法很重要:通过行政索赔和机构登记处衡量的糖尿病护理质量
Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec;51(6):2206-2220. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12453. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Study protocol: ACCESS: (Advancing Contraceptive Equity and Service Uptake through Telemedicine in the US Safety-Net).研究方案:ACCESS(通过远程医疗促进美国安全网地区避孕公平性和服务获取)。
Res Sq. 2025 Aug 25:rs.3.rs-6256504. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6256504/v1.
2
Equivalence of electronic health record data for measuring hypertension prevalence: a retrospective comparison to BRFSS with data from two Indiana health systems, 2021.用于测量高血压患病率的电子健康记录数据的等效性:2021年印第安纳州两个医疗系统的数据与BRFSS的回顾性比较
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):1285. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22425-9.
3
Electronic health record data quality assessment and tools: a systematic review.电子健康记录数据质量评估及工具:系统综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Sep 25;30(10):1730-1740. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad120.
4
US "Safety Net" Clinics Provide Access to Effective Contraception for Adolescents and Young Women, 2017-2019.美国“安全网”诊所为青少年和年轻女性提供有效的避孕措施,2017-2019 年。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Jun;112(S5):S555-S562. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306913.
5
A narrative review on the validity of electronic health record-based research in epidemiology.基于电子健康记录的流行病学研究的有效性的叙述性综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01416-5.
6
Missing data in primary care research: importance, implications and approaches.基层医疗研究中的数据缺失:重要性、影响及应对方法
Fam Pract. 2021 Mar 29;38(2):200-203. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa134.
7
Using Electronic Health Records in Longitudinal Studies: Estimating Patient Attrition.在纵向研究中使用电子健康记录:估计患者流失情况。
Med Care. 2020 Jun;58 Suppl 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 6 1):S46-S52. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001298.
8
Validation of an Optimized Algorithm for Identifying Persons Living With Diagnosed HIV From New York State Medicaid Data, 2006-2014.验证一种从纽约州医疗补助数据中识别确诊 HIV 感染者的优化算法,2006-2014 年。
Am J Epidemiol. 2020 May 5;189(5):470-480. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz225.
9
Study protocol: a mixed-methods study of women's healthcare in the safety net after Affordable Care Act implementation - EVERYWOMAN.研究方案:平价医疗法案实施后安全网中妇女保健的混合方法研究 - EVERYWOMAN。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jun 11;17(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0445-y.
10
Assessing outpatient follow-up care compliance, complications, and sequelae in children hospitalized for isolated traumatic abdominal injuries.评估因孤立性创伤性腹部损伤住院儿童的门诊随访护理依从性、并发症和后遗症。
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Aug;54(8):1617-1620. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring quality in pediatrics: Florida's early experiences with the CHIPRA core measure set.衡量儿科医疗质量:佛罗里达州采用儿童健康保险计划再授权法案核心指标集的早期经验。
Matern Child Health J. 2014 Aug;18(6):1300-7. doi: 10.1007/s10995-013-1379-6.
2
The OCHIN community information network: bringing together community health centers, information technology, and data to support a patient-centered medical village.OCHIN 社区信息网络:将社区健康中心、信息技术和数据汇集在一起,以支持以患者为中心的医疗村。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 May-Jun;26(3):271-8. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.03.120234.
3
Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2012.2001 - 2012年美国门诊医生诊所中电子健康记录系统的使用情况及特点
NCHS Data Brief. 2012 Dec(111):1-8.
4
Are pediatric quality care measures too stringent?儿科质量护理措施是否过于严格?
J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;25(5):686-93. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2012.05.120041.
5
Beyond capitation: how new payment experiments seek to find the 'sweet spot' in amount of risk providers and payers bear.超越人头费:新的支付试验如何寻求找到提供者和支付者承担风险的“最佳点”。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Sep;31(9):1951-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0344.
6
Feasibility of evaluating the CHIPRA care quality measures in electronic health record data.评估 CHIPRA 护理质量措施在电子健康记录数据中的可行性。
Pediatrics. 2012 Jul;130(1):139-49. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3705. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
7
Validity of electronic health record-derived quality measurement for performance monitoring.电子健康记录衍生的质量测量在绩效监测中的有效性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug;19(4):604-9. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000557. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
8
Quality measurement of medication monitoring in the "meaningful use" era.在“有意义的使用”时代衡量药物监测的质量。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Sep;17(9):633-7.
9
Electronic health records vs Medicaid claims: completeness of diabetes preventive care data in community health centers.电子健康记录与医疗补助索赔:社区卫生中心中糖尿病预防保健数据的完整性。
Ann Fam Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;9(4):351-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.1279.
10
Measuring and reporting quality of health care for children: CHIPRA and beyond.测量和报告儿童保健质量:《儿童健康保险计划》及其他。
Acad Pediatr. 2011 May-Jun;11(3 Suppl):S77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2010.10.003.