Pahor Marco, Guralnik Jack M, Ambrosius Walter T, Blair Steven, Bonds Denise E, Church Timothy S, Espeland Mark A, Fielding Roger A, Gill Thomas M, Groessl Erik J, King Abby C, Kritchevsky Stephen B, Manini Todd M, McDermott Mary M, Miller Michael E, Newman Anne B, Rejeski W Jack, Sink Kaycee M, Williamson Jeff D
Department of Aging and Geriatric Research,University of Florida, Gainesville.
Department of Aging and Geriatric Research,University of Florida, Gainesville2Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
JAMA. 2014 Jun 18;311(23):2387-96. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.5616.
In older adults reduced mobility is common and is an independent risk factor for morbidity, hospitalization, disability, and mortality. Limited evidence suggests that physical activity may help prevent mobility disability; however, there are no definitive clinical trials examining whether physical activity prevents or delays mobility disability.
To test the hypothesis that a long-term structured physical activity program is more effective than a health education program (also referred to as a successful aging program) in reducing the risk of major mobility disability.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders (LIFE) study was a multicenter, randomized trial that enrolled participants between February 2010 and December 2011, who participated for an average of 2.6 years. Follow-up ended in December 2013. Outcome assessors were blinded to the intervention assignment. Participants were recruited from urban, suburban, and rural communities at 8 centers throughout the United States. We randomized a volunteer sample of 1635 sedentary men and women aged 70 to 89 years who had physical limitations, defined as a score on the Short Physical Performance Battery of 9 or below, but were able to walk 400 m.
Participants were randomized to a structured, moderate-intensity physical activity program (n = 818) conducted in a center (twice/wk) and at home (3-4 times/wk) that included aerobic, resistance, and flexibility training activities or to a health education program (n = 817) consisting of workshops on topics relevant to older adults and upper extremity stretching exercises.
The primary outcome was major mobility disability objectively defined by loss of ability to walk 400 m.
Incident major mobility disability occurred in 30.1% (246 participants) of the physical activity group and 35.5% (290 participants) of the health education group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.69-0.98], P = .03).Persistent mobility disability was experienced by 120 participants (14.7%) in the physical activity group and 162 participants (19.8%) in the health education group (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.57-0.91]; P = .006). Serious adverse events were reported by 404 participants (49.4%) in the physical activity group and 373 participants (45.7%) in the health education group (risk ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.98-1.20]).
A structured, moderate-intensity physical activity program compared with a health education program reduced major mobility disability over 2.6 years among older adults at risk for disability. These findings suggest mobility benefit from such a program in vulnerable older adults.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01072500.
在老年人中,活动能力下降很常见,并且是发病、住院、残疾和死亡的独立危险因素。有限的证据表明,体育活动可能有助于预防活动能力残疾;然而,尚无确凿的临床试验来检验体育活动是否能预防或延缓活动能力残疾。
检验以下假设:长期结构化体育活动计划在降低严重活动能力残疾风险方面比健康教育计划(也称为成功老龄化计划)更有效。
设计、设置和参与者:老年人生活方式干预与独立性(LIFE)研究是一项多中心随机试验,于2010年2月至2011年12月招募参与者,他们平均参与了2.6年。随访于2013年12月结束。结局评估者对干预分配不知情。参与者从美国8个中心的城市、郊区和农村社区招募。我们将1635名年龄在70至89岁、有身体限制(定义为简短体能状况量表得分9分或以下)但能够行走400米的久坐不动的男性和女性志愿者样本进行随机分组。
参与者被随机分配到在中心(每周两次)和家中(每周3 - 4次)进行的结构化中等强度体育活动计划(n = 818),该计划包括有氧运动、阻力训练和柔韧性训练活动,或被分配到健康教育计划(n = 817),该计划包括与老年人相关主题的研讨会和上肢伸展运动。
主要结局是根据无法行走400米的能力丧失客观定义的严重活动能力残疾。
体育活动组中30.1%(246名参与者)发生了新发严重活动能力残疾,健康教育组中这一比例为35.5%(290名参与者)(风险比[HR],0.82[95%置信区间,[0.69 - 0.98],P = 0.03)。体育活动组中有120名参与者(14.7%)经历了持续性活动能力残疾,健康教育组中有162名参与者(19.8%)经历了持续性活动能力残疾(HR,0.72[95%置信区间,0.57 - 0.91];P = 0.006)。体育活动组中有404名参与者(49.4%)报告了严重不良事件,健康教育组中有373名参与者(45.7%)报告了严重不良事件(风险比,1.08[95%置信区间,0.98 - 1.20])。
与健康教育计划相比,结构化中等强度体育活动计划在2.6年时间里降低了有残疾风险的老年人的严重活动能力残疾。这些发现表明,此类计划对脆弱的老年人的活动能力有益。
clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT01072500。