Gill Thomas M, Beavers Daniel P, Guralnik Jack M, Pahor Marco, Fielding Roger A, Hauser Michelle, Manini Todd M, Marsh Anthony P, McDermott Mary M, Newman Anne B, Allore Heather G, Miller Michael E
Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Adler Geriatric Center, 874 Howard Avenue, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA.
Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
BMC Med. 2017 Mar 28;15(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0824-6.
Among older persons, disability is often precipitated by intervening illnesses and injuries leading to hospitalization. In the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders (LIFE) Study, a structured moderate-intensity physical activity program, compared with a health education program, was shown to significantly reduce the amount of time spent with major mobility disability (MMD) over the course of 3.5 years. We aimed to determine whether the benefit of the physical activity program in promoting independent mobility was diminished in the setting of intervening hospitalizations.
We analyzed data from a single-blinded, parallel group randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01072500). In this trial, 1635 sedentary persons, aged 70-89 years, who had functional limitations but were able to walk 400 m, were randomized from eight US centers between February 2010 and December 2013: 818 to physical activity (800 received intervention) and 817 to health education (805 received intervention). Intervening hospitalizations and MMD, defined as the inability to walk 400 m, were assessed every 6 months for up to 3.5 years.
For both the physical activity and health education groups, intervening hospitalizations were strongly associated with the initial onset of MMD and inversely associated with recovery from MMD, defined as a transition from initial MMD onset to no MMD. The benefit of the physical activity intervention did not differ significantly based on hospital exposure. For onset of MMD, the hazard ratios (HR) were 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-1.1) and 0.77 (0.62-0.95) in the presence and absence of intervening hospitalizations, respectively (P-interaction, 0.903). For recovery of MMD, the magnitude of effect was modestly greater among participants who were hospitalized (HR 1.5, 95% CI 0.71-3.0) than in those who were not hospitalized (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.88-1.7), but this difference did not achieve statistical significance (P-interaction, 0.670).
Intervening hospitalizations had strong deleterious effects on the onset of MMD and recovery from MMD, but did not diminish the beneficial effect of the LIFE physical activity intervention in promoting independent mobility. To achieve sustained benefits over time, structured physical activity programs should be designed to accommodate acute illnesses and injuries leading to hospitalizations given their high frequency in older persons with functional limitations.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01072500 .
在老年人中,残疾往往由导致住院的介入性疾病和损伤引发。在老年人生活方式干预与独立性(LIFE)研究中,与健康教育项目相比,结构化中等强度体育活动项目在3.5年的时间里显著减少了重度行动障碍(MMD)的时长。我们旨在确定在发生介入性住院的情况下,体育活动项目在促进独立行动方面的益处是否会减弱。
我们分析了一项单盲、平行组随机试验(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01072500)的数据。在该试验中,1635名年龄在70 - 89岁、有功能限制但能行走400米的久坐不动者于2010年2月至2013年12月期间从美国8个中心随机分组:818人进入体育活动组(800人接受干预),817人进入健康教育组(805人接受干预)。每6个月评估一次介入性住院情况和MMD(定义为无法行走400米),最长评估3.5年。
对于体育活动组和健康教育组,介入性住院都与MMD的初始发作密切相关,且与从MMD恢复(定义为从初始MMD发作转变为无MMD)呈负相关。体育活动干预的益处不因是否有住院经历而有显著差异。对于MMD发作,在有和没有介入性住院的情况下,风险比(HR)分别为0.79(95%置信区间[CI] 0.58 - 1.1)和0.77(0.62 - 0.95)(交互作用P值,0.903)。对于MMD恢复,住院参与者的效应量(HR 1.5,95% CI 0.71 - 3.0)略大于未住院参与者(HR 1.2,95% CI 0.88 - 1.7),但这种差异未达到统计学显著性(交互作用P值,0.670)。
介入性住院对MMD的发作和从MMD恢复有强烈的有害影响,但并未减弱LIFE体育活动干预在促进独立行动方面的有益效果。为了随着时间推移实现持续益处,鉴于功能受限的老年人中急性疾病和损伤导致住院的频率较高,应设计结构化体育活动项目以适应这些情况。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT01072500 。