Strehlow U, Piesiur-Strehlow B
Acta Paedopsychiatr. 1989;52(2):89-100.
In questionning altogether 313 parents who had made use of the help of child psychiatry, as well as parents who had taken their child to a children's hospital, or persons who lived in the vicinity of a child psychiatric clinic, clear prejudices against children who had undergone child psychiatric treatment, their families and facilities were found. The child and adolescent psychiatrist's job description and his sphere of responsibility were indefinite and not well-defined in comparison with other professional groups (e.g. psychologists). His advice was often only sought for after other facilities, above all paediatricians and educational advice centres, had been consulted without the desired success. Parents who had made use of a child psychiatrist's help were less inclined to prejudices and were better informed than the other two groups mentioned above. Even today however, patients who have undergone psychiatric treatment and their families still have to reckon on reservations in their social surroundings especially from other children.
在对总共313位曾借助儿童精神病学帮助的家长、带孩子去过儿童医院的家长以及住在儿童精神科诊所附近的人进行询问时,发现了对接受过儿童精神科治疗的孩子、其家庭以及机构的明显偏见。与其他专业群体(如心理学家)相比,儿童及青少年精神科医生的工作职责和责任范围不明确且界定不清。往往是在咨询了其他机构,尤其是儿科医生和教育咨询中心但未取得预期效果之后,才会寻求他的建议。曾借助儿童精神科医生帮助的家长比上述其他两类群体更不易抱有偏见且信息更灵通。然而,即使在今天,接受过精神科治疗的患者及其家人在社交环境中仍不得不考虑他人的保留态度,尤其是来自其他孩子的。