Mellor D J
a Animal Welfare Science and Bioethics Centre , PN452, Massey University , Palmerston North 4442 , New Zealand.
N Z Vet J. 2015 Jan;63(1):9-16. doi: 10.1080/00480169.2014.926800. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
Affective neuroscience, incorporating neurophysiology and neuropsychology, is providing increasing evidence that certain behaviours of animals may be interpreted in terms of what they are intending to achieve, i.e. their goals. It is also providing evidence that allows inferences to be made about the affective contents of some goal-directed behaviours. These neuroscience-supported inferences are aligned with recommendations based on prior behaviour-based investigations of animals' preferences, aversions and priorities, and these observations together support the cautious use of particular behaviours to infer what the accompanying affects may be. In this review, therefore, some attention is given to negative affects and their relationships to poor animal welfare, but the primary focus is the positive affects animals may experience when they successfully engage in rewarding goal-directed behaviours, encapsulated in the concept of positive affective engagement. The review draws together reports of environment-focused and animal-to-animal interactive behaviours observed in a range of species and under diverse circumstances in order to illustrate the likely widespread occurrence of the positive affects that may accompany them. Particular consideration is given to affects that are potentially associated with some aspects of exploration and food acquisition in stimulus rich or impoverished environments, and to those that may be associated with aspects of the affiliative interactions of bonding or bond affirmation, maternal care, play and sexual activity. It is concluded that animals given the opportunity to engage in such activities may experience some positive affects. However, the intensity of an animal's experience of particular positive affects is likely to range from zero to very high because the associated behaviours occur intermittently, variation may occur during different phases of a goal-directed behaviour, and other positive or negative affects experienced at the same time may have greater impact. As good welfare is achieved both by minimising negative affects and promoting positive ones and as conscious sentient animals may be expected to have an interest in experiencing as little pain and as much pleasure as possible, it is argued that there is an ethical obligation to take practical steps to help them to achieve these outcomes. Such steps would include providing them with opportunities to express more behaviours that are associated with rewarding or satisfying experiences understood in terms of positive affective engagement.
情感神经科学融合了神经生理学和神经心理学,越来越多的证据表明,动物的某些行为可以根据它们想要实现的目标来解释,即它们的目的。它还提供了证据,使得人们能够对一些目标导向行为的情感内容进行推断。这些得到神经科学支持的推断与基于先前对动物偏好、厌恶和优先级的行为学研究得出的建议相一致,这些观察结果共同支持谨慎地利用特定行为来推断伴随的情感可能是什么。因此,在本综述中,我们会关注负面影响及其与动物福利不佳的关系,但主要重点是动物在成功参与有奖励的目标导向行为时可能体验到的积极影响,这体现在积极情感参与的概念中。本综述汇集了在一系列物种和不同环境中观察到的以环境为重点的行为以及动物与动物之间互动行为的报告,以说明可能伴随这些行为出现的积极影响很可能广泛存在。我们特别考虑了在丰富或匮乏刺激环境中与探索和获取食物的某些方面可能相关的影响,以及与建立联系或确认联系、母性关怀、玩耍和性行为等亲和互动方面可能相关的影响。得出的结论是,有机会参与此类活动的动物可能会体验到一些积极影响。然而,动物对特定积极影响的体验强度可能从零到非常高,因为相关行为是间歇性发生的,在目标导向行为的不同阶段可能会出现变化,并且同时经历的其他积极或消极影响可能会产生更大的影响。由于通过尽量减少负面影响和促进积极影响来实现良好的福利,并且由于有意识的有感知能力的动物可能会有兴趣尽可能少地体验痛苦并尽可能多地体验快乐,因此有人认为有道德义务采取实际措施帮助它们实现这些结果。这些措施将包括为它们提供机会,让它们表现出更多与基于积极情感参与理解的有奖励或令人满意的体验相关的行为。