Suppr超能文献

为什么关于洋地黄的不同试验会得出相互矛盾的数据。

Why different trials on digitalis give conflicting data.

作者信息

Jaeschke R, Guyatt G H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1989 Jan;2(6):727-31. doi: 10.1007/BF00133200.

Abstract

Taking a careful look at each of the outcomes measured in randomized, controlled trials of digoxin suggest that discrepancies in results may be more apparent than real. Digoxin does work, but clinically important benefit is restricted to a relatively small proportion of congestive heart failure (CHF) patients. The play of chance, the dose of digoxin used, and the severity of heart failure in patients enrolled in the studies are other factors that may explain the variability in results that were observed. A systematic examination of the sort undertaken here is likely to help resolve apparent difference in outcomes of clinical trials of new (and old) therapies in CHF patients.

摘要

仔细审视地高辛随机对照试验中所测量的各项结果表明,结果差异可能看似比实际情况更为明显。地高辛确实有作用,但临床上的显著益处仅限于相对较小比例的充血性心力衰竭(CHF)患者。机遇因素、所用地高辛剂量以及研究中纳入患者的心力衰竭严重程度是其他可能解释所观察到的结果变异性的因素。像此处所进行的这种系统性审查,可能有助于解决CHF患者新(及旧)疗法临床试验结果中明显的差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验