Suppr超能文献

一种评估健康指数的方法框架。

A methodological framework for assessing health indices.

作者信息

Kirshner B, Guyatt G

出版信息

J Chronic Dis. 1985;38(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90005-0.

Abstract

Tests or measures in clinical medicine or the social sciences can be used for three purposes: discriminating between subjects, predicting either prognosis or the results of some other test, and evaluating change over time. The choices made at each stage of constructing a quality of life index will differ depending on the purpose of the instrument. We explore the implications of index purpose for each stage of instrument development: selection of the item pool, item scaling, item reduction, determination of reliability, of validity, and of responsiveness. At many of these stages, not only are the requirements for discriminative, predictive, and evaluative instruments not complementary, they are actually competing. Attention to instrument purpose will clarify the choices both for those developing quality of life measures and for those selecting an appropriate instrument for clinical studies.

摘要

临床医学或社会科学中的测试或测量可用于三个目的

区分受试者、预测预后或其他某项测试的结果,以及评估随时间的变化。构建生活质量指数的每个阶段所做的选择将因工具的目的而异。我们探讨指数目的对工具开发各阶段的影响:项目池的选择、项目缩放、项目缩减、可靠性、有效性和反应性的确定。在这些阶段中的许多阶段,不仅区分性、预测性和评估性工具的要求并非互补,实际上它们是相互竞争的。关注工具目的将为生活质量测量的开发者以及为临床研究选择合适工具的人明确选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验