Guyatt G H, Bombardier C, Tugwell P X
CMAJ. 1986 Apr 15;134(8):889-95.
While measurement of quality of life is a vital part of assessing the effect of treatment in many clinical trials, a measure that is responsive to clinically important change is often unavailable. Investigators are therefore faced with the challenge of constructing an index for a specific condition or even for a single trial. There are several stages in the development and testing of a quality-of-life measure: selecting an initial item pool, choosing the "best" items from that pool, deciding on questionnaire format, pretesting the instrument, and demonstrating the responsiveness and validity of the instrument. At each stage the investigator must choose between a rigorous, time-consuming approach to questionnaire construction that will establish the clinical relevance, responsiveness and validity of the instrument and a more efficient, less costly strategy that leaves reproducibility, responsiveness and validity untested. This article describes these options and outlines a pragmatic approach that yields consistently satisfactory disease-specific measures of quality of life.
在许多临床试验中,生活质量测量是评估治疗效果的重要组成部分,但通常无法获得对临床重要变化有反应的测量方法。因此,研究人员面临着为特定疾病甚至单个试验构建指标的挑战。生活质量测量的开发和测试有几个阶段:选择初始项目池,从该池中选择“最佳”项目,确定问卷格式,对工具进行预测试,并证明该工具的反应性和有效性。在每个阶段,研究人员必须在构建问卷的严谨、耗时方法(该方法将确立工具的临床相关性、反应性和有效性)与更高效、成本更低的策略之间做出选择,后者使可重复性、反应性和有效性未经测试。本文描述了这些选择,并概述了一种实用方法,该方法能产生始终令人满意的特定疾病生活质量测量方法。