Suppr超能文献

痴呆症患者的生活质量:对痴呆症专用测量量表的系统叙述性综述

Quality of life in dementia: a systematically conducted narrative review of dementia-specific measurement scales.

作者信息

Bowling Ann, Rowe Gene, Adams Sue, Sands Paula, Samsi Kritika, Crane Maureen, Joly Louise, Manthorpe Jill

机构信息

a Faculty of Health Sciences , University of Southampton , Southampton , UK.

出版信息

Aging Ment Health. 2015 Jan;19(1):13-31. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.915923. Epub 2014 Jun 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Ascertaining the quality of life (QoL) in people with dementia is important for evaluating service outcomes and cost-effectiveness. This paper identifies QoL measures for people with dementia and assesses their properties.

METHOD

A systematic narrative review identified articles using dementia QoL measures. Electronic databases searched were AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, Index to Theses, IBSS, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Sociological Abstracts, and Web of Science. All available years and languages (if with an English language abstract) were included.

RESULTS

Searches yielded 6806 citations; 3043 were multiple duplicates (759 being true duplicates). Abstracts were read; 182 full papers were selected/obtained, of which 126 were included as relevant. Few measures were based on rigorous conceptual frameworks. Some referenced Lawton's model (Dementia Quality of Life [DQOL] and Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease [QOL-AD]), though these tapped part of this only; others claimed relationship to a health-related QoL concept (e.g. DEMQOL), though had less social relevance; others were based on limited domains (e.g. activity, affect) or clinical opinions (Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia [QUALID]). Many measures were based on proxy assessments or observations of people with dementia's QoL, rather than their own ratings. The Bath Assessment of Subjective Quality of Life in Dementia (BASQID) was developed involving people with dementia and caregivers, but excluded some of their main themes. All measures were tested on selective samples only (ranging from community to hospital clinics, or subsamples/waves of existing population surveys), in a few sites. Their general applicability remains unknown, and predictive validity remains largely untested.

CONCLUSION

The lack of consensus on measuring QoL in dementia suggests a need for a broader, more rigorously tested QoL measure.

摘要

目的

确定痴呆症患者的生活质量(QoL)对于评估服务结果和成本效益很重要。本文确定了痴呆症患者的生活质量测量方法并评估其特性。

方法

通过系统的叙述性综述确定使用痴呆症生活质量测量方法的文章。检索的电子数据库包括AMED、CINAHL、EMBASE、论文索引、IBSS、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、社会学文摘和科学网。纳入所有可用年份和语言(如有英文摘要)的文献。

结果

检索得到6806条引文;其中3043条为多重重复(759条为真正重复)。阅读了摘要;选择/获取了182篇全文,其中126篇被纳入相关文献。很少有测量方法基于严谨的概念框架。一些参考了劳顿模型(痴呆症生活质量[DQOL]和阿尔茨海默病生活质量[QOL-AD]),但这些仅涉及该模型的一部分;其他一些声称与健康相关的生活质量概念有关(如DEMQOL),但社会相关性较低;其他一些基于有限的领域(如活动、情感)或临床意见(晚期痴呆症生活质量[QUALID])。许多测量方法基于对痴呆症患者生活质量的代理评估或观察,而非他们自己的评分。痴呆症主观生活质量巴斯评估(BASQID)是在痴呆症患者和护理人员参与下制定的,但排除了他们的一些主要主题。所有测量方法仅在少数地点的选择性样本(从社区到医院诊所,或现有人口调查的子样本/波次)上进行了测试。它们的普遍适用性仍然未知,预测效度也基本未得到检验。

结论

在痴呆症生活质量测量方面缺乏共识表明需要一种更广泛、经过更严格测试的生活质量测量方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验