Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, UK.
Care Policy and Evaluation Centre (CPEC), London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Dementia (London). 2023 Nov;22(8):1718-1737. doi: 10.1177/14713012231190585. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
There is a notable lack of evidence on what constitutes good practice in remote quantitative data collection from research participants with dementia. During the COVID-19 pandemic face-to-face research became problematic, especially where participants were older and more at risk of infection. The DETERMIND-C19 study, a large cohort study of people with dementia, switched to telephone data collection over this period. This paper explores the experiences of researchers who collected quantitative data over the telephone from people with dementia during the first COVID-19 lockdowns in England. The aim was to learn from these experiences, share insights and inform future research practice across disciplines. Seven DETERMIND researchers were interviewed about the processes and challenges of collecting quantitative data from people with dementia over the telephone compared to face-to-face. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Two themes were developed: first the telephone adds an extra layer of confusion to an already cognitively complex interaction. Second, researchers found it difficult to recognise subtle cues that signalled participants' rising emotion over the telephone in time to prevent distress. The researchers employed strategies to support participants which may not have conformed to the strict conventions of structured interviewing, but which were informed by person-oriented principles. Whilst in practice this may be a common approach to balancing the needs of participants and the requirements of quantitative research, it is rare for studies to openly discuss such trade-offs in the literature. Honest, reflective reporting is required if the practice of remote data collection from people with dementia is to progress ethically and with integrity.
在如何从患有痴呆症的研究参与者那里进行远程定量数据收集方面,缺乏良好实践的明显证据。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,面对面的研究变得很成问题,尤其是对于那些年龄较大且感染风险较高的参与者而言。DETERMIND-C19 研究是一项针对痴呆症患者的大型队列研究,在此期间,该研究转为通过电话进行定量数据收集。本文探讨了在英格兰第一次 COVID-19 封锁期间,研究人员通过电话从痴呆症患者那里收集定量数据的经验。目的是从这些经验中学习,分享见解,并为跨学科的未来研究实践提供信息。对七名 DETERMIND 研究人员进行了采访,了解与面对面相比,通过电话从痴呆症患者那里收集定量数据的过程和挑战。使用反思性主题分析对数据进行了分析。确定了两个主题:首先,电话给已经认知复杂的交互增加了额外的混淆层。其次,研究人员发现很难及时识别出电话中参与者情绪上升的微妙信号,从而防止他们感到痛苦。研究人员采用了支持参与者的策略,这些策略可能不符合结构化访谈的严格规范,但这些策略是基于以人为本的原则。虽然在实践中,这可能是平衡参与者需求和定量研究要求的常见方法,但在文献中很少有研究公开讨论这种权衡。如果要从道德和诚信的角度来发展远程从痴呆症患者那里收集数据的实践,就需要诚实、反思性的报告。