Voigt Karen, Taché Stephanie, Klement Andreas, Fankhaenel Thomas, Bojanowski Stefan, Bergmann Antje
Department of General Practice/Medical Clinic III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus of the Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
BMC Fam Pract. 2014 May 6;15:87. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-15-87.
Home visits are part of general practice work in Germany. Within the context of an expanding elderly population and a decreasing number of general practitioner (GPs), open questions regarding the organisation and adequacy of GPs' care in immobile patients remain. To answer these questions, we will conduct a representative primary data collection concerning contents and organisation of GPs' home visits in 2014. Because this study will require considerable efforts for documentation and thus substantial involvement by participating GPs, we conducted a pilot study to see whether such a study design was feasible.
We used a mixed methods design with two study arms in a sample of teaching GPs of the University Halle. The quantitative arm evaluates participating GPs and documentation of home visits. The qualitative arm focuses on reasons for non-participation for GPs who declined to take part in the pilot study.
Our study confirms previously observed reasons for non-response of GPs in the particular setting of home visits including lack of time and/or interest. In contrast to previous findings, monetary incentives were not crucial for GPs participation. Several factors influenced the documentation rate of home visits and resulted in a discrepancy between the numbers of home visits documented versus those actually conducted. The most frequently reported problem was related to obtaining patient consent, especially when patients were unable to provide informed consent due to cognitive deficits.
The results of our feasibility study provide evidence for improvement of the study design and study instruments to effectively conduct a documentation-intensive study of GPs doing home visits. Improvement of instructions and questionnaire regarding time variables and assessment of the need for home visits will be carried out to increase the reliability of future data. One particularly important methodological issue yet to be resolved is how to increase the representativeness of home visit care by including the homebound patient population that is unable to provide informed consent.
家访是德国全科医疗工作的一部分。在老年人口不断增加而全科医生数量不断减少的背景下,关于行动不便患者的全科医生护理组织和充分性仍存在一些未解决的问题。为回答这些问题,我们将在2014年针对全科医生家访的内容和组织进行具有代表性的原始数据收集。由于该研究需要大量的记录工作,因此需要参与的全科医生大量投入,我们进行了一项试点研究,以了解这样的研究设计是否可行。
我们采用混合方法设计,在哈雷大学的教学全科医生样本中设置两个研究组。定量组评估参与的全科医生和家访记录。定性组关注拒绝参与试点研究的全科医生不参与的原因。
我们的研究证实了先前观察到的在特定家访环境中全科医生不回应的原因,包括时间和/或兴趣的缺乏。与先前的研究结果相反,金钱激励对全科医生的参与并不关键。几个因素影响了家访的记录率,导致记录的家访次数与实际进行的家访次数之间存在差异。最常报告的问题与获得患者同意有关,特别是当患者由于认知缺陷而无法提供知情同意时。
我们可行性研究的结果为改进研究设计和研究工具提供了证据,以便有效地对进行家访的全科医生开展一项记录密集型研究。将对关于时间变量和家访需求评估的说明和问卷进行改进,以提高未来数据的可靠性。一个尚未解决的特别重要的方法学问题是如何通过纳入无法提供知情同意的居家患者群体来提高家访护理的代表性。