Corrigan Neil, Bankart Michael J G, Gray Laura J, Smith Karen L
Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 22-28 Princess Road West, Leicester LE1 6TP, UK.
Trials. 2014 May 24;15:184. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-184.
There are many methodological challenges in the conduct and analysis of cluster randomised controlled trials, but one that has received little attention is that of post-randomisation changes to cluster composition. To illustrate this, we focus on the issue of cluster merging, considering the impact on the design, analysis and interpretation of trial outcomes.
We explored the effects of merging clusters on study power using standard methods of power calculation. We assessed the potential impacts on study findings of both homogeneous cluster merges (involving clusters randomised to the same arm of a trial) and heterogeneous merges (involving clusters randomised to different arms of a trial) by simulation. To determine the impact on bias and precision of treatment effect estimates, we applied standard methods of analysis to different populations under analysis.
Cluster merging produced a systematic reduction in study power. This effect depended on the number of merges and was most pronounced when variability in cluster size was at its greatest. Simulations demonstrate that the impact on analysis was minimal when cluster merges were homogeneous, with impact on study power being balanced by a change in observed intracluster correlation coefficient (ICC). We found a decrease in study power when cluster merges were heterogeneous, and the estimate of treatment effect was attenuated.
Examples of cluster merges found in previously published reports of cluster randomised trials were typically homogeneous rather than heterogeneous. Simulations demonstrated that trial findings in such cases would be unbiased. However, simulations also showed that any heterogeneous cluster merges would introduce bias that would be hard to quantify, as well as having negative impacts on the precision of estimates obtained. Further methodological development is warranted to better determine how to analyse such trials appropriately. Interim recommendations include avoidance of cluster merges where possible, discontinuation of clusters following heterogeneous merges, allowance for potential loss of clusters and additional variability in cluster size in the original sample size calculation, and use of appropriate ICC estimates that reflect cluster size.
整群随机对照试验的实施和分析存在许多方法学挑战,但其中一个很少受到关注的是整群组成在随机化后的变化。为了说明这一点,我们聚焦于整群合并问题,考虑其对试验结果的设计、分析和解释的影响。
我们使用标准的效能计算方法探讨了合并整群对研究效能的影响。我们通过模拟评估了同质整群合并(涉及随机分配到试验同一组的整群)和异质合并(涉及随机分配到试验不同组的整群)对研究结果的潜在影响。为了确定对治疗效果估计的偏倚和精度的影响,我们将标准分析方法应用于不同的分析人群。
整群合并导致研究效能系统性降低。这种效应取决于合并的数量,并且在整群大小的变异性最大时最为明显。模拟表明,当整群合并是同质的时,对分析的影响最小,观察到的组内相关系数(ICC)的变化平衡了对研究效能的影响。我们发现当整群合并是异质的时,研究效能会降低,并且治疗效果的估计会减弱。
在先前发表的整群随机试验报告中发现的整群合并例子通常是同质的而非异质的。模拟表明,在这种情况下试验结果将是无偏的。然而,模拟也表明,任何异质整群合并都会引入难以量化的偏倚,并且会对所获得估计的精度产生负面影响。有必要进一步开展方法学研究,以更好地确定如何恰当地分析此类试验。临时建议包括尽可能避免整群合并,在异质合并后停止整群,在原始样本量计算中考虑整群潜在的损失和整群大小的额外变异性,以及使用反映整群大小的适当ICC估计值。