Department of Neurology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, No, 107, West Yanjiang Road, Guangzhou 510120, People's Republic of China.
BMC Med Educ. 2014 May 20;14:98. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-98.
Neurology is complex, abstract, and difficult for students to learn. However, a good learning method for neurology clerkship training is required to help students quickly develop strong clinical thinking as well as problem-solving skills. Both the traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) and the relatively new team-based learning (TBL) methods have inherent strengths and weaknesses when applied to neurology clerkship education. However, the strengths of each method may complement the weaknesses of the other. Combining TBL with LBL may produce better learning outcomes than TBL or LBL alone. We propose a hybrid method (TBL + LBL) and designed an experiment to compare the learning outcomes with those of pure LBL and pure TBL.
One hundred twenty-seven fourth-year medical students attended a two-week neurology clerkship program organized by the Department of Neurology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital. All of the students were from Grade 2007, Department of Clinical Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University. These students were assigned to one of three groups randomly: Group A (TBL + LBL, with 41 students), Group B (LBL, with 43 students), and Group C (TBL, with 43 students). The learning outcomes were evaluated by a questionnaire and two tests covering basic knowledge of neurology and clinical practice.
The practice test scores of Group A were similar to those of Group B, but significantly higher than those of Group C. The theoretical test scores and the total scores of Group A were significantly higher than those of Groups B and C. In addition, 100% of the students in Group A were satisfied with the combination of TBL + LBL.
Our results support our proposal that the combination of TBL + LBL is acceptable to students and produces better learning outcomes than either method alone in neurology clerkships. In addition, the proposed hybrid method may also be suited for other medical clerkships that require students to absorb a large amount of abstract and complex course materials in a short period, such as pediatrics and internal medicine clerkships.
神经科学复杂、抽象,学生难以学习。然而,需要一种好的学习方法来帮助学生快速发展强大的临床思维和解决问题的能力。传统的基于讲座的学习(LBL)和相对较新的团队学习(TBL)方法在应用于神经科实习教育时都有其自身的优势和劣势。然而,每种方法的优势可能会弥补另一种方法的劣势。将 TBL 与 LBL 相结合可能会产生比单独使用 TBL 或 LBL 更好的学习效果。我们提出了一种混合方法(TBL+LBL),并设计了一项实验来比较与纯 LBL 和纯 TBL 的学习效果。
127 名四年级医学生参加了中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院神经内科组织的为期两周的神经科实习课程。所有学生均来自中山大学中山医学院临床医学 2007 级。这些学生被随机分配到三个小组之一:A 组(TBL+LBL,41 名学生)、B 组(LBL,43 名学生)和 C 组(TBL,43 名学生)。学习成果通过问卷调查和涵盖神经科基础知识和临床实践的两项测试进行评估。
A 组的实践测试成绩与 B 组相似,但明显高于 C 组。A 组的理论测试成绩和总分明显高于 B 组和 C 组。此外,A 组的 100%学生对 TBL+LBL 的组合感到满意。
我们的结果支持我们的建议,即 TBL+LBL 的组合对学生来说是可以接受的,并且在神经科实习中比单独使用任何一种方法都能产生更好的学习效果。此外,这种混合方法也可能适用于其他需要学生在短时间内吸收大量抽象和复杂课程材料的医学实习课程,如儿科学和内科学实习。