Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Center for Fetal Medicine, Pregnancy Care and Delivery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04975-x.
Team-based learning (TBL) is an evidence-based pedagogical method that has been used in undergraduate medical education since 2001. However, its use in clinical disciplines is rarely reported, and the impact of its implementation is not known. The aim of this study was to explore and map the published literature on the impact of implementing TBL in clinical disciplines in undergraduate medical education.
A comprehensive search of Medline, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), and Web of Science databases was performed on November 24, 2021 and updated April 6, 2023, using relevant Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text terms. Original research studies reporting on the implementation of TBL in clinical disciplines in undergraduate medical education published in peer-reviewed English language journals were included irrespective of their methodological design.
The initial search identified 2,383 records. Of these, 49 met the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies (n = 44, 90%) described the implementation of a modified version of TBL in which one or more TBL steps were missing, and one study had undefined protocol for the implementation. The most reported outcomes were knowledge acquisition (n = 38, 78%) and students' satisfaction or attitudes toward TBL (n = 34, 69%). Despite some differences in their results, the studies found that implementing TBL is associated with increased knowledge acquisition (n = 19, 39%), student engagement (n = 6, 12%), and student satisfaction (n = 31, 63%).
Most of the studies reported positive results in students' satisfaction and students' engagement, whilst the results on knowledge acquisition and retention were more contradictory. In most of the studies, TBL was implemented in a modified form and diverse comparators were used. The methodological quality also varied. Thus, no unequivocal conclusions could be drawn regarding the value of implementing TBL in clinical disciplines. More studies with rigorous methodologies are needed in this field.
团队学习(TBL)是一种基于证据的教学方法,自 2001 年以来一直在本科医学教育中使用。然而,它在临床学科中的应用很少被报道,其实施的影响也不清楚。本研究的目的是探索和绘制在本科医学教育中实施 TBL 对临床学科的影响的已发表文献。
于 2021 年 11 月 24 日和 2023 年 4 月 6 日在 Medline、教育资源信息中心(ERIC)和 Web of Science 数据库中进行了全面检索,使用了相关的医学主题词(MeSH)和自由文本术语。纳入了无论其方法设计如何,都在同行评议的英语期刊上发表的报告本科医学教育中临床学科实施 TBL 的原始研究。
初步搜索确定了 2383 条记录。其中,有 49 项符合纳入标准。大多数研究(n=44,90%)描述了 TBL 的修改版本的实施,其中一个或多个 TBL 步骤缺失,一项研究对实施的方案没有明确定义。报告最多的结果是知识获取(n=38,78%)和学生对 TBL 的满意度或态度(n=34,69%)。尽管结果存在一些差异,但这些研究发现,实施 TBL 与知识获取的增加(n=19,39%)、学生参与(n=6,12%)和学生满意度(n=31,63%)有关。
大多数研究报告了学生满意度和学生参与度的积极结果,而知识获取和保留方面的结果则更为矛盾。在大多数研究中,TBL 是以修改的形式实施的,并且使用了不同的对照物。方法质量也各不相同。因此,对于在临床学科中实施 TBL 的价值,不能得出明确的结论。该领域需要更多具有严格方法学的研究。