Suppr超能文献

中国眼科学实习中的改良团队学习法。

Modified Team-Based Learning in an Ophthalmology Clerkship in China.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People´s Republic of China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0154250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154250. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Team-based learning (TBL) is an increasingly popular teaching method in medical education. However, TBL hasn't been well-studied in the ophthalmology clerkship context. This study was to examine the impact of modified TBL in such context and to assess the student evaluations of TBL.

METHODS

Ninety-nine students of an 8-year clinical medicine program from Zhongshan Ophthalmic Centre, Sun Yat-sen University, were randomly divided into four sequential units and assigned to six teams with the same faculty. The one-week ophthalmology clerkship module included traditional lectures, gross anatomy and a TBL module. The effects of the TBL module on student performance were measured by the Individual Readiness Assurance Test (IRAT), the Group Readiness Assurance Test (GRAT), the Group Application Problem (GAP) and final examination scores (FESs). Students' evaluations of TBL were measured by a 16-item questionnaire. IRAT and GRAT scores were compared using a paired t-test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and subgroup analysis compared the effects among quartiles that were stratified by the Basic Ophthalmology Levels (BOLs). The BOLs were evaluated before the ophthalmology clerkship.

RESULTS

In TBL classes, the GRAT scores were significantly higher than the IRAT scores in both the full example and the BOL-stratified groups. It highlighted the advantages of TBL compared to the individual learning. Quartile-stratified ANOVA comparisons showed significant differences at FES scores (P < 0.01). In terms to IRAT, GRAT and GAP scores, there was no significant result. Moreover, IRAT scores only significantly differed between the first and fourth groups. The FES scores of the first three groups are significantly higher than the fourth group. Gender-specific differences were significant in FES but not the IRAT. Overall, 57.65% of student respondents agreed that TBL was helpful. Male students tended to rate TBL higher than female students.

CONCLUSION

The application of modified TBL to the ophthalmology clerkship curriculum improved students' performance and increased students' engagement and satisfaction. TBL should be further optimized and developed to enhance the educational outcomes among multi-BOLs medical students.

摘要

目的

团队学习(TBL)是医学教育中一种越来越流行的教学方法。然而,TBL 在眼科实习课程中尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在检验这种背景下改良 TBL 的影响,并评估学生对 TBL 的评价。

方法

中山大学中山眼科中心八年制临床医学专业的 99 名学生被随机分为四个连续单元,并分配到六个由相同教师组成的团队。为期一周的眼科实习模块包括传统讲座、大体解剖学和 TBL 模块。TBL 模块对学生表现的影响通过个人准备保证测试(IRAT)、小组准备保证测试(GRAT)、小组应用问题(GAP)和期末考试成绩(FESs)来衡量。学生对 TBL 的评价通过 16 项问卷进行衡量。使用配对 t 检验比较 IRAT 和 GRAT 分数。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)和亚组分析比较按基础眼科水平(BOL)分层的四分位数之间的效果。BOL 在眼科实习前进行评估。

结果

在 TBL 课程中,无论是在完整示例组还是 BOL 分层组中,GRAT 分数均明显高于 IRAT 分数。这突出了 TBL 相对于个人学习的优势。四分位分层 ANOVA 比较显示 FES 分数存在显著差异(P < 0.01)。就 IRAT、GRAT 和 GAP 分数而言,没有显著结果。此外,IRAT 分数仅在第一组和第四组之间存在显著差异。前三个组的 FES 分数明显高于第四组。FES 存在性别特异性差异,但 IRAT 没有。总体而言,57.65%的学生受访者认为 TBL 有帮助。男生比女生更倾向于认为 TBL 更有帮助。

结论

将改良 TBL 应用于眼科实习课程提高了学生的表现,并提高了学生的参与度和满意度。应进一步优化和发展 TBL,以提高多 BOL 医学生的教育成果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d60/4839717/0920e388d9ff/pone.0154250.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验