Suppr超能文献

非手术治疗与切开复位内固定治疗桡骨头稳定、移位、部分关节内骨折的随机对照试验:RAMBO试验

A randomized controlled trial of nonoperative treatment versus open reduction and internal fixation for stable, displaced, partial articular fractures of the radial head: the RAMBO trial.

作者信息

Bruinsma Wendy, Kodde Izaäk, de Muinck Keizer Robert-Jan O, Kloen Peter, Lindenhovius Anneluuk L C, Vroemen Jos P A M, Haverlag Robert, van den Bekerom Michel P J, Bolhuis Hugo W, Bullens Pieter H J, Meylaerts Sven A G, van der Zwaal Peer, Steller Philip E, Hageman Michiel, Ring David C, den Hartog Dennis, Hammacher Eric R, King Graham J W, Athwal George S, Faber Ken J, Drosdowech Darren, Grewal Ruby, Goslings J Carel, Schep Niels W L, Eygendaal Denise

机构信息

Trauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 May 6;15:147. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-147.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The choice between operative or nonoperative treatment is questioned for partial articular fractures of the radial head that have at least 2 millimeters of articular step-off on at least one radiograph (defined as displaced), but less than 2 millimeter of gap between the fragments (defined as stable) and that are not associated with an elbow dislocation, interosseous ligament injury, or other fractures. These kinds of fractures are often classified as Mason type-2 fractures. Retrospective comparative studies suggest that operative treatment might be better than nonoperative treatment, but the long-term results of nonoperative treatment are very good. Most experts agree that problems like reduced range of motion, painful crepitation, nonunion or bony ankylosis are infrequent with both nonoperative and operative treatment of an isolated displaced partial articular fracture of the radial head, but determining which patients will have problems is difficult. A prospective, randomized comparison would help minimize bias and determine the balance between operative and nonoperative risks and benefits.

METHODS/DESIGN: The RAMBO trial (Radial Head - Amsterdam - Amphia - Boston - Others) is an international prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. The primary objective of this study is to compare patient related outcome defined by the 'Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score' twelve months after injury between operative and nonoperative treated patients. Adult patients with partial articular fractures of the radial head that comprise at least 1/3rd of the articular surface, have ≥ 2 millimeters of articular step-off but less than 2 millimeter of gap between the fragments will be enrolled. Secondary outcome measures will be the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI), the Oxford Elbow Score (OES), pain intensity through the 'Numeric Rating Scale', range of motion (flexion arc and rotational arc), radiographic appearance of the fracture (heterotopic ossification, radiocapitellar and ulnohumeral arthrosis, fracture healing, and signs of implant loosening or breakage) and adverse events (infection, nerve injury, secondary interventions) after one year.

DISCUSSION

The successful completion of this trial will provide evidence on the best treatment for stable, displaced, partial articular fractures of the radial head.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered at the Dutch Trial Register: NTR3413.

摘要

背景

对于桡骨头部分关节骨折,若在至少一张X线片上有至少2毫米的关节台阶(定义为移位),但骨折块之间的间隙小于2毫米(定义为稳定),且不伴有肘关节脱位、骨间韧带损伤或其他骨折,手术治疗与非手术治疗的选择存在争议。这类骨折常被归类为梅森2型骨折。回顾性比较研究表明,手术治疗可能优于非手术治疗,但非手术治疗的长期效果也非常好。大多数专家一致认为,对于孤立的移位性桡骨头部分关节骨折,非手术和手术治疗后出现活动范围减小、疼痛性摩擦音、骨不连或骨融合等问题并不常见,但很难确定哪些患者会出现这些问题。一项前瞻性随机对照研究将有助于减少偏倚,并确定手术和非手术治疗的风险与益处之间的平衡。

方法/设计:RAMBO试验(桡骨头 - 阿姆斯特丹 - 安菲亚 - 波士顿 - 其他)是一项国际前瞻性随机多中心试验。本研究的主要目的是比较手术治疗和非手术治疗患者在受伤12个月后由“手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分”定义的与患者相关的结局。将纳入桡骨头部分关节骨折且关节面至少累及1/3、关节台阶≥2毫米但骨折块之间间隙小于2毫米的成年患者。次要结局指标将包括梅奥肘关节功能指数(MEPI)、牛津肘关节评分(OES)、通过“数字评分量表”评估的疼痛强度、活动范围(屈曲弧和旋转弧)、骨折的影像学表现(异位骨化、桡骨头和尺肱关节关节炎、骨折愈合以及植入物松动或断裂的迹象)以及1年后的不良事件(感染、神经损伤、二次干预)。

讨论

本试验的成功完成将为稳定、移位的桡骨头部分关节骨折的最佳治疗提供证据。

试验注册

该试验已在荷兰试验注册中心注册:NTR3413。

相似文献

2
Is ORIF superior to nonoperative treatment in isolated displaced partial articular fractures of the radial head?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2105-12. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3541-x.
4
Operative vs. nonoperative treatment for Mason type 2 radial head fractures: a randomized controlled trial.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jul;30(7):1670-1678. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.025. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
7
8
Mason type III radial head fractures treated by anatomic radial head arthroplasty: Is this a safe treatment option?
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):183-189. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
10
Primary nonoperative treatment of moderately displaced two-part fractures of the radial head.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Sep;88(9):1909-14. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01052.

引用本文的文献

1
Mason type III fractures of the radial head: ORIF, resection or prosthetic replacement?
Musculoskelet Surg. 2023 Jun;107(2):223-230. doi: 10.1007/s12306-022-00745-y. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
2
The value of elbow arthroscopy in diagnosing and treatment of radial head fractures.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Jul 27;20(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2726-6.
3
Radial head arthroplasty: a historical perspective.
Int Orthop. 2019 Jul;43(7):1643-1651. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4082-9. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
4
Reasons for surgical revision after conservatively treated radial head fractures-retrospective study of 70 patients.
Obere Extrem. 2018;13(2):112-120. doi: 10.1007/s11678-018-0456-2. Epub 2018 May 15.
7
Current concepts in the management of radial head fractures.
World J Orthop. 2015 Dec 18;6(11):954-60. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i11.954.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment of Mason type II radial head fractures without associated fractures or elbow dislocation: a systematic review.
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Jul;37(7):1416-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.03.042. Epub 2012 May 22.
2
Upper extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Feb 1;94(3):277-85. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01744.
3
The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2011 Jul 30;6:39. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-39.
4
Radial head fractures: loss of cortical contact is associated with concomitant fracture or dislocation.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jan;19(1):21-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.015.
6
The development and validation of a patient-reported questionnaire to assess outcomes of elbow surgery.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Apr;90(4):466-73. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.20290.
7
Displaced fractures of the neck of the radius in adults. An excellent long-term outcome.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 May;88(5):642-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B5.17226.
8
Radial head fractures: MRI evaluation of associated injuries.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Jul-Aug;14(4):421-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.11.003.
9
Open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the radial head.
Hand Clin. 2004 Nov;20(4):415-27, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2004.06.001.
10
Some observations on fractures of the head of the radius with a review of one hundred cases.
Br J Surg. 1954 Sep;42(172):123-32. doi: 10.1002/bjs.18004217203.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验