Li Jian-Sheng, Xie Yang, Li Su-Yun, Yu Xue-Qing
The Geriatric Department, Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Longzihu University Town, Zhengdong New District, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Trials. 2014 May 1;15:153. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-153.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects millions worldwide. Although many therapies exist and are being developed to relieve symptoms and reduce mortality, few data are available to understand which of the therapeutic alternatives is the most cost-effective for COPD patients in everyday clinical practice, especially for traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). Comparative effectiveness research can help patients, clinicians, and decision-makers make best informed treatment decisions where such evidence was previously lacking. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and economic evaluation of three treatments: (1) conventional Western medicine; (2) TCM treatments, which have been evaluated and have certain effect; and (3) a combination of both conventional Western medicine and TCM treatments, and then determine which treatment is the most suitable for COPD patients.
METHODS/DESIGN: A multicenter, pragmatic, randomized, controlled trial is adopted. A total of 360 patients will be recruited and randomly assigned to one of the three treatments group, with 120 in each group. Patients in the conventional Western medicine group will be given Salbutamol, Formoterol, Salmeterol/fluticasone, respectively, according to the guidelines. For the TCM group, patients will be given Bufei granule, Bu-Fei Jian-Pi granule, Bu-Fei Yi-Shen granule, and Yi-Qi Zi-Shen granule based on their corresponding TCM syndrome patterns, respectively. For the combination of conventional medicine and TCM treatments group, patients will be given a combination of conventional Western medicine and TCM granules. Treatments in each group are recognized as a whole comprehensive intervention. After the 26-week treatment, another 26 weeks will be followed up. The outcome measures including the frequency and duration of acute exacerbations, lung function, dyspnea, exercise capacity, quality of life, and economic evaluation will be assessed.
It is hypothesized that each of the three treatments will have beneficial effects in reducing the frequency and duration of acute exacerbations, improving exercise capacity and psychosocial function of COPD patients. In addition, the combination of conventional medicine and TCM treatments may be most suitable for COPD patients with better effectiveness and economic evaluation.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01836016.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)影响着全球数百万人。尽管有许多疗法存在且正在研发以缓解症状和降低死亡率,但在日常临床实践中,对于COPD患者而言,几乎没有数据可用于了解哪种治疗方案最具成本效益,尤其是对于传统中医药(TCM)。比较有效性研究可帮助患者、临床医生和决策者在先前缺乏此类证据的情况下做出最明智的治疗决策。本研究旨在比较三种治疗方法的有效性和经济学评估:(1)传统西医治疗;(2)已被评估且有一定疗效的中医治疗;(3)传统西医治疗与中医治疗相结合,然后确定哪种治疗最适合COPD患者。
方法/设计:采用多中心、实用、随机、对照试验。共招募360名患者,随机分配到三个治疗组之一,每组120名。西医组患者将根据指南分别给予沙丁胺醇、福莫特罗、沙美特罗/氟替卡松。中医组患者将根据其相应的中医证型分别给予补肺颗粒、补肺健脾颗粒、补肺益肾颗粒和益气滋肾颗粒。中西医结合治疗组患者将给予西医与中药颗粒的组合。每组治疗均被视为一种全面的综合干预。26周治疗后,将进行另外26周的随访。将评估的结局指标包括急性加重的频率和持续时间、肺功能、呼吸困难、运动能力、生活质量和经济学评估。
假设三种治疗方法在降低COPD患者急性加重的频率和持续时间、改善运动能力和心理社会功能方面均有有益效果。此外,中西医结合治疗可能对COPD患者最适合,有效性和经济学评估更佳。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01836016