Suppr超能文献

让用户及其亲属参与心理健康服务评估。

Involvement of users and relatives in mental health service evaluation.

作者信息

Barbato Angelo, D'Avanzo Barbara, D'Anza Vito, Montorfano Emanuele, Savio Monica, Corbascio Caterina G

机构信息

*Laboratory of Epidemiology and Social Psychiatry, IRCCS Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan, Italy; †IRIS Postgraduate School of Psychotherapy, Milan, Italy; ‡Department of Mental Health of Pistoia, Pistoia, Italy; and §Department of Mental Health, Azienda Sanitaria Locale AT, Asti, Italy.

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 2014 Jun;202(6):479-86. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000148.

Abstract

Although Italian mental health (MH) services are community based, user and relative participation in service evaluation lagged behind until lately. We here review three recent studies involving stakeholder participation in service evaluation: two were quantitative studies, one on 204 users in an MH service in Pistoia (Central Italy) and the other on 2259 relatives, conducted with the National Union of Associations for Mental Health. The third (supported by The Centro per il Controllo delle Malattie, the ministerial Center for Disease Control) was a qualitative study in seven MH services, involving users, relatives, and professionals together, which collected interviews from 136 users, 119 relatives, and 79 professionals. In the quantitative studies, positive evaluations outnumbered negative ones. The qualitative study explored negative aspects in greater depth. Common findings were insufficient information, underinvolvement of users-relatives in planning, no choice of clinician, psychiatrist domination, and limited helpfulness of interventions. With stakeholder participation in service evaluation, the present medical framework will need reshaping.

摘要

尽管意大利的心理健康服务以社区为基础,但用户和亲属参与服务评估的情况直到最近才有所改善。我们在此回顾三项近期涉及利益相关者参与服务评估的研究:两项是定量研究,一项针对意大利中部皮斯托亚一家心理健康服务机构的204名用户,另一项针对与全国心理健康协会联盟合作的2259名亲属。第三项研究(由部长级疾病控制中心Centro per il Controllo delle Malattie资助)是对七家心理健康服务机构的定性研究,同时涉及用户、亲属和专业人员,共收集了136名用户、119名亲属和79名专业人员的访谈。在定量研究中,正面评价多于负面评价。定性研究更深入地探讨了负面方面。常见的发现包括信息不足、用户和亲属在规划中参与度不够、无法选择临床医生、精神科医生主导以及干预措施的帮助有限。随着利益相关者参与服务评估,现有的医疗框架需要重塑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验