Verbestel Vera, De Henauw Stefaan, Bammann Karin, Barba Gianvincenzo, Hadjigeorgiou Charalambos, Eiben Gabriele, Konstabel Kenn, Kovács Eva, Pitsiladis Yannis, Reisch Lucia, Santaliestra-Pasías Alba M, Maes Lea, De Bourdeaudhuij Ilse
1Department of Movement and Sports Sciences,Ghent University,Watersportlaan 2,Ghent 9000,Belgium.
2Department of Public Health,Ghent University,Ghent,Belgium.
Public Health Nutr. 2015 Apr;18(5):860-8. doi: 10.1017/S136898001400086X. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
The aim of the present study was to investigate if context-specific measures of parental-reported physical activity and sedentary behaviour are associated with objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time in children.
Cross-sectional study.
Seven European countries taking part in the IDEFICS (Identification and Prevention of Dietary- and Lifestyle-induced Health Effects in Children and Infants) study.
Data were analysed from 2-9-year-old children (n 5982) who provided both parental-reported and accelerometer-derived physical activity/sedentary behaviour measures. Parents reported their children's daily screen-time, weekly sports participation and daily outdoor playtime by means of the Outdoor Playtime Checklist (OPC) and Outdoor Playtime Recall Questions (OPRQ).
Sports participation, OPC- and OPRQ-derived outdoor play were positively associated with accelerometer-derived physical activity. Television viewing and computer use were positively associated with accelerometer-derived sedentary time. All parental-reported measures that were significantly associated with accelerometer outcomes explained only a minor part of the variance in accelerometer-derived physical activity or sedentary time.
Parental-reported measures of physical activity and sedentary behaviour are not useful as a proxy for 2-9-year-old children's physical activity and sedentary time. Findings do not preclude the use of context-specific measures but imply that conclusions should be limited to the context-specific behaviours that are actually measured. Depending on the aim of the study, future research should carefully consider the choice of measurements, including the use of subjective or objective measures of the behaviour of interest or a combination of both.
本研究旨在调查父母报告的特定情境下的身体活动和久坐行为指标是否与儿童客观测量的身体活动和久坐时间相关。
横断面研究。
七个欧洲国家参与了IDEFICS(儿童和婴儿饮食及生活方式引起的健康影响识别与预防)研究。
对2至9岁儿童(n = 5982)的数据进行分析,这些儿童同时提供了父母报告的和通过加速度计得出的身体活动/久坐行为指标。父母通过户外玩耍时间清单(OPC)和户外玩耍时间回忆问题(OPRQ)报告孩子的每日屏幕时间、每周体育参与情况和每日户外玩耍时间。
体育参与、基于OPC和OPRQ的户外玩耍与通过加速度计得出的身体活动呈正相关。看电视和使用电脑与通过加速度计得出的久坐时间呈正相关。所有与加速度计测量结果显著相关的父母报告指标仅解释了通过加速度计得出的身体活动或久坐时间差异的一小部分。
父母报告的身体活动和久坐行为指标不能有效地替代2至9岁儿童的身体活动和久坐时间。研究结果并不排除使用特定情境下的指标,但意味着结论应限于实际测量的特定情境下的行为。根据研究目的,未来研究应仔细考虑测量方法的选择,包括使用感兴趣行为的主观或客观测量方法或两者结合。