Li Hongyu, Hu Zhigang, Chen Jiang, Guo Xiaozhong
Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area, Shenyang, 110840, People's Republic of China.
Tumour Biol. 2014 Sep;35(9):8867-74. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2154-z. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
In the current study, we performed a systematic review of literature pertaining to the diagnostic value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and combined ERCP plus EUS to pancreatic cancer. We searched MEDLINE, OVID, and the Cochrane Library for studies evaluating diagnostic validity of ERCP, EUS, and ERCP plus EUS between January 1989 and May 2014. We obtained pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC). A total of 10 studies that included 669 patients who fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria were considered for inclusion in the analysis. The pooled sensitivities of EUS, ERCP, and EUS plus ERCP were 76.7, 57.9, and 79.9 %, respectively. The pooled specificities were 91.7, 90.6, and 94.2 %, respectively. The *Q index estimates were 0.828, 0.862, and 0.896, respectively. The *Q indices for EUS and EUS plus ERCP were significantly higher compared with ERCP (P = 0.010 and 0.008, respectively). Our meta-analysis showed that ERCP plus EUS was associated with a high diagnostic value for the detection of pancreatic neoplasms compared with ERCP and EUS alone.
在本研究中,我们对有关内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)、内镜超声检查(EUS)以及ERCP联合EUS对胰腺癌的诊断价值的文献进行了系统综述。我们检索了MEDLINE、OVID和Cochrane图书馆,以查找1989年1月至2014年5月期间评估ERCP、EUS以及ERCP联合EUS诊断有效性的研究。我们获得了敏感性、特异性和汇总受试者工作特征曲线(SROC)的合并估计值。共有10项研究纳入分析,这些研究包括669例符合所有纳入标准的患者。EUS、ERCP以及EUS联合ERCP的合并敏感性分别为76.7%、57.9%和79.9%。合并特异性分别为91.7%、90.6%和94.2%。Q指数估计值分别为0.828、0.862和0.896。与ERCP相比,EUS和EUS联合ERCP的Q指数显著更高(分别为P = 0.010和0.008)。我们的荟萃分析表明,与单独的ERCP和EUS相比,ERCP联合EUS对胰腺肿瘤的检测具有较高的诊断价值。