Rajaee S S, Kanim L E A, Bae H W
Spine Center and Orthopedic Center , Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Spine Center , Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Bone Joint J. 2014 Jun;96-B(6):807-16. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B6.31149.
Using the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified national trends in revision spinal fusion along with a comprehensive comparison of comorbidities, inpatient complications and surgical factors of revision spinal fusion compared to primary spinal fusion. In 2009, there were 410 158 primary spinal fusion discharges and 22 128 revision spinal fusion discharges. Between 2002 and 2009, primary fusion increased at a higher rate compared with revision fusion (56.4% vs 51.0%; p < 0.001). In 2009, the mean length of stay and hospital charges were higher for revision fusion discharges than for primary fusion discharges (4.2 days vs 3.8 days, p < 0.001; USD $91 909 vs. $87 161, p < 0.001). In 2009, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) was used more in revision fusion than in primary fusion (39.6% vs 27.6%, p < 0.001), whereas interbody devices were used less in revision fusion (41.8% vs 56.6%, p < 0.001). In the multivariable logistic regression model for all spinal fusions, depression (odds ratio (OR) 1.53, p < 0.001), psychotic disorders (OR 1.49, p < 0.001), deficiency anaemias (OR 1.35, p < 0.001) and smoking (OR 1.10, p = 0.006) had a greater chance of occurrence in revision spinal fusion discharges than in primary fusion discharges, adjusting for other variables. In terms of complications, after adjusting for all significant comorbidities, this study found that dural tears (OR 1.41; p < 0.001) and surgical site infections (OR 3.40; p < 0.001) had a greater chance of occurrence in revision spinal fusion discharges than in primary fusion discharges (p < 0.001). A p-value < 0.01 was considered significant in all final analyses.
利用美国全国住院患者样本,我们确定了翻修脊柱融合术的全国趋势,并对翻修脊柱融合术与初次脊柱融合术的合并症、住院并发症及手术因素进行了全面比较。2009年,有410158例初次脊柱融合术出院病例和22128例翻修脊柱融合术出院病例。2002年至2009年期间,初次融合术的增长率高于翻修融合术(56.4%对51.0%;p<0.001)。2009年,翻修融合术出院病例的平均住院时间和住院费用高于初次融合术出院病例(4.2天对3.8天,p<0.001;91909美元对87161美元,p<0.001)。2009年,重组人骨形态发生蛋白(BMP)在翻修融合术中的使用比初次融合术中更多(39.6%对27.6%,p<0.001),而椎间融合器在翻修融合术中的使用较少(41.8%对56.6%,p<0.001)。在所有脊柱融合术的多变量逻辑回归模型中,在调整其他变量后,抑郁症(优势比(OR)1.53,p<0.001)、精神障碍(OR 1.49,p<0.001)、缺铁性贫血(OR 1.35,p<0.001)和吸烟(OR 1.10,p=0.006)在翻修脊柱融合术出院病例中的发生几率高于初次融合术出院病例。在并发症方面,在调整所有显著合并症后,本研究发现硬脊膜撕裂(OR 1.41;p<0.001)和手术部位感染(OR 3.40;p<0.001)在翻修脊柱融合术出院病例中的发生几率高于初次融合术出院病例(p<0.001)。在所有最终分析中,p值<0.01被认为具有统计学意义。