The University of Texas Health Science Center.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 May 8;15(3):4718. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4718.
The benefits of four-dimensional computed tomography (4D CT) are limited by the presence of artifacts that remain difficult to quantify. A correlation-based metric previously proposed for ciné 4D CT artifact identification was further validated as an independent artifact evaluator by using a novel qualitative assessment featuring a group of observers reaching a consensus decision on artifact location and magnitude. The consensus group evaluated ten ciné 4D CT scans for artifacts over each breathing phase of coronal lung views assuming one artifact per couch location. Each artifact was assigned a magnitude score of 1-5, 1 indicating lowest severity and 5 indicating highest severity. Consensus group results served as the ground truth for assessment of the correlation metric. The ten patients were split into two cohorts; cohort 1 generated an artifact identification threshold derived from receiver operating characteristic analysis using the Youden Index, while cohort 2 generated sensitivity and specificity values from application of the artifact threshold. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated between the correlation metric values and the consensus group scores for both cohorts. The average sensitivity and specificity values found with application of the artifact threshold were 0.703 and 0.476, respectively. The correlation coefficients of artifact magnitudes for cohort 1 and 2 were 0.80 and 0.61, respectively, (p < 0.001 for both); these correlation coefficients included a few scans with only two of the five possible magnitude scores. Artifact incidence was associated with breathing phase (p < 0.002), with presentation less likely near maximum exhale. Overall, the correlation metric allowed accurate and automated artifact identification. The consensus group evaluation resulted in efficient qualitative scoring, reduced interobserver variation, and provided consistent identification of artifact location and magnitudes.
四维计算机断层扫描(4D CT)的优点受到伪影的限制,这些伪影仍然难以量化。先前为电影 4D CT 伪影识别提出的基于相关的指标,通过使用一种新的定性评估方法得到了进一步验证,该方法具有一组观察者就伪影位置和程度达成共识的决策。共识小组评估了十个电影 4D CT 扫描在冠状肺视图的每个呼吸阶段的伪影,假设每个床位置有一个伪影。每个伪影的严重程度评分从 1 到 5,1 表示最低严重程度,5 表示最高严重程度。共识小组的结果作为评估相关指标的真实情况。将这 10 名患者分为两组;组 1 生成了一个使用接受者操作特征分析和 Youden 指数得出的伪影识别阈值,而组 2 则从应用该伪影阈值得出了灵敏度和特异性值。对于两组,都计算了相关指标值与共识小组评分之间的 Pearson 相关系数。应用伪影阈值后,灵敏度和特异性的平均值分别为 0.703 和 0.476。对于组 1 和 2,伪影程度的相关系数分别为 0.80 和 0.61(两者均 p < 0.001);这些相关系数包括几个只有五个可能程度评分中的两个的扫描。伪影发生率与呼吸阶段有关(p < 0.002),呼气末期出现的可能性较小。总体而言,相关指标允许准确且自动的伪影识别。共识小组的评估产生了高效的定性评分,减少了观察者之间的差异,并一致识别了伪影的位置和程度。