Addictive Substance Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Dental Anesthesiology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Addictive Substance Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan.
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 3;9(6):e98548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098548. eCollection 2014.
The predictors of postoperative pain and analgesic consumption were previously found to include preoperative pain, anxiety, age, type of surgery, and genotype, but remaining unclear was whether intraoperative factors could predict postoperative pain. In the present study, we investigated the time-course of fentanyl consumption using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia records from patients who underwent orthognathic surgery for mandibular prognathism and analyzed the influence of anesthesia methods and surgical methods together with sex on the time course. A significant difference in the time course of fentanyl administration was found (P<0.001). No significant difference in the time course of fentanyl administration was found between males and females (P = 0.653), with no interaction between time course and sex (P = 0.567). No significant difference in the time course of fentanyl administration was found among anesthesia methods, such as fentanyl induction followed by fentanyl maintenance, fentanyl induction followed by remifentanil maintenance, and remifentanil induction followed by remifentanil maintenance (P = 0.512), but an interaction between time course and anesthesia method was observed (P = 0.004). A significant difference in the time course of fentanyl administration was found between surgical methods, such as bilateral mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) and BSSRO combined with Le Fort I osteotomy (bimaxillary; P = 0.008), with no interaction between time course and surgical method (P = 0.535). Total postoperative 24 h consumption associated with the bimaxillary procedure was significantly higher than with BSSRO (P = 0.008). The present results indicate that administration patterns and total 24 h consumption were different among the three groups of anesthesia methods and between the two groups of surgical methods, respectively. Although more research on patient-controlled analgesia patterns and consumption is necessary, the present study will contribute to adequately relieving individual patients from postoperative pain.
先前发现,术后疼痛和镇痛药物消耗的预测因素包括术前疼痛、焦虑、年龄、手术类型和基因型,但仍不清楚术中因素是否可以预测术后疼痛。在本研究中,我们调查了接受下颌前突正颌手术的患者静脉患者自控镇痛记录中的芬太尼消耗时间过程,并分析了麻醉方法和手术方法以及性别对时间过程的影响。芬太尼给药的时间过程存在显著差异(P<0.001)。男性和女性之间芬太尼给药的时间过程没有差异(P = 0.653),时间过程和性别之间没有相互作用(P = 0.567)。芬太尼诱导后芬太尼维持、芬太尼诱导后瑞芬太尼维持和瑞芬太尼诱导后瑞芬太尼维持等麻醉方法之间芬太尼给药的时间过程没有差异(P = 0.512),但时间过程和麻醉方法之间存在相互作用(P = 0.004)。双侧下颌矢状劈开截骨术(BSSRO)和 BSSRO 联合 Le Fort I 截骨术(双颌)等手术方法之间芬太尼给药的时间过程存在显著差异(P = 0.008),时间过程和手术方法之间没有相互作用(P = 0.535)。双颌手术的总术后 24 小时消耗与 BSSRO 显著更高(P = 0.008)。这些结果表明,三种麻醉方法组和两种手术方法组之间的给药模式和总 24 小时消耗存在差异。尽管需要对患者自控镇痛模式和消耗进行更多研究,但本研究将有助于为个别患者充分缓解术后疼痛。