Devlin Niamh F C, McNulty Breige A, Turrini Aida, Tlustos Christina, Hearty Aine P, Volatier Jean-Luc, Kelleher Cecily C, Nugent Anne P
a UCD Institute of Food and Health , University College Dublin , Dublin , Ireland.
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2014;31(8):1347-57. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2014.930970. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
Total diet studies (TDS) are recognised as a cost-effective approach in estimating dietary exposure to chemicals in food. It has been advised that candidate foods for inclusion in TDS analysis should represent a large part of the typical diet to estimate accurately the exposure of a population group. To date a variety of approaches have been used to determine which foods should be included in a core TDS food list, with no agreed method. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare four of these approaches by creating TDS food lists for adult populations in Europe using summary statistics data from the EFSA Comprehensive Food Consumption Database. Both a food group approach and a total diet approach were employed, and foods were selected for inclusion in the TDS food lists if they met the criteria as defined by consumption weight and/or a 5% consumer rate. Using all four approaches the representation of the diet across the TDS food lists was > 85%. The food group approach showed a slight advantage in diet representation, but produced considerably longer TDS food lists in comparison with the total diet approach. The addition of a 5% consumer rate to both approaches had little impact on results. In conclusion, the total diet approach may act as a more cost-effective approach in comparison with the food group approach while still achieving comprehensive results in the creation of core TDS food lists.
总膳食研究(TDS)被认为是一种估算食物中化学物质膳食暴露量的经济有效方法。有人建议,纳入TDS分析的候选食物应占典型饮食的很大一部分,以便准确估算人群的暴露量。迄今为止,已采用多种方法来确定哪些食物应列入TDS核心食物清单,但尚无商定的方法。因此,本研究的目的是通过利用欧洲食品安全局综合食品消费数据库的汇总统计数据,为欧洲成年人群创建TDS食物清单,比较其中四种方法。采用了食物分组法和总膳食法,如果食物符合按消费重量和/或5%的消费者比例定义的标准,则选择将其纳入TDS食物清单。使用所有四种方法,TDS食物清单中饮食的代表性均>85%。食物分组法在饮食代表性方面略有优势,但与总膳食法相比,生成的TDS食物清单长得多。两种方法都增加5%的消费者比例对结果影响不大。总之,与食物分组法相比,总膳食法可能是一种更具成本效益的方法,同时在创建TDS核心食物清单时仍能取得全面的结果。