• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部晚期肝门部胆管癌的手术切除技术

Surgical resection techniques for locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

作者信息

Govil Sanjay, Reddy Mettu Srinivas, Rela Mohamed

机构信息

National Foundation for Liver Research, Global Hospital, Chennai, India.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Aug;399(6):707-16. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1216-4. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-014-1216-4
PMID:24893723
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma involves major hepatectomy including caudate lobectomy. It is technically challenging because of the complex, intimate and variable relationship between biliary and vascular structures in the liver hilum. Resectability rates vary from 30 to 80 % and about one third of patients have microscopically involved margins. However, adequately performed resections provide 5-year survival of 30-40 % and are worth pursuing.

PURPOSE

Better understanding of anatomy, better imaging, improved surgical techniques and progress in perioperative care of these patients have pushed the limits of resection of these tumours. Many of the traditional indicators of inoperability such as bilateral involvement of second-order hepatic ducts, contralateral biliary and vascular involvement, and need for arterial resection have been overcome or are being challenged. This review discusses techniques that may increase margin-free resectability of Bismuth-Corlette type III and IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma requires extended liver resection and often vascular resection, despite which the margin may be compromised in about one third of patients. Right sided tumours are likely to need right trisectionectomy and portal vein resection, best served by an en bloc hilar resection or Rex-recess approach. Left-sided tumours often involve contralateral blood vessels and require left trisegmentectomy with possible right portal vein or right hepatic artery reconstruction. These tumours are best tackled by hepatobiliary surgeons with experience in microvascular techniques. Salvage procedures when arterial reconstruction is not feasible are still under evaluation.

摘要

背景

肝门部胆管癌切除术涉及包括尾状叶切除在内的大范围肝切除术。由于肝门部胆管与血管结构之间存在复杂、紧密且多变的关系,该手术在技术上具有挑战性。可切除率在30%至80%之间,约三分之一的患者切缘有显微镜下受累。然而,充分实施的切除术可使5年生存率达到30% - 40%,值得开展。

目的

对这些患者解剖结构的更深入了解、更好的影像学检查、改进的手术技术以及围手术期护理的进展,推动了此类肿瘤切除术的极限。许多传统的不可切除指标,如二级肝管双侧受累、对侧胆管和血管受累以及动脉切除的必要性等,已被克服或正受到挑战。本综述讨论了可能提高Bismuth - Corlette III型和IV型肝门部胆管癌无瘤切缘可切除性的技术。

结论

晚期肝门部胆管癌需要扩大肝切除,且常需血管切除,尽管如此,约三分之一的患者切缘仍可能受到影响。右侧肿瘤可能需要右半肝三叶切除术和门静脉切除,整块肝门切除或Rex隐窝入路是最佳选择。左侧肿瘤常累及对侧血管,需要左半肝三叶切除,并可能需要重建右门静脉或右肝动脉。这些肿瘤最好由有微血管技术经验的肝胆外科医生处理。动脉重建不可行时的挽救性手术仍在评估中。

相似文献

1
Surgical resection techniques for locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma.局部晚期肝门部胆管癌的手术切除技术
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Aug;399(6):707-16. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1216-4. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
2
Right trisectionectomy with principle en bloc portal vein resection for right-sided hilar cholangiocarcinoma: no-touch technique.右三叶切除术联合整块门静脉切除治疗右肝门部胆管癌:无接触技术。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Apr;19(4):1324-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2072-x. Epub 2011 Oct 15.
3
Hepatectomy with simultaneous resection of the portal vein and hepatic artery for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: an audit of 50 consecutive cases.肝切除术联合门静脉和肝动脉切除治疗高位肝门部胆管癌:50 例连续病例的回顾性分析。
Ann Surg. 2010 Jul;252(1):115-23. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e463a7.
4
Right hepatectomy for a detoured left hepatic artery in hilar cholangiocarcinoma-report of a rare but rational resection.肝门部胆管癌合并左肝动脉绕行的右半肝切除术——1例罕见但合理的肝切除报告
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Nov 16;14(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-1045-8.
5
Novel en-bloc resection of locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma: the Rex recess approach.局部晚期肝门部胆管癌的新型整块切除术:雷克斯隐窝入路。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2014 Feb;13(1):93-7. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(14)60013-8.
6
Robotic Klatskin Type 3A Resection with Biliary Reconstruction: Description of Surgical Technique and Outcomes of Initial Series.机器人 Klatskin 型 3A 切除术联合胆道重建:手术技术描述及初步系列结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;30(13):8559-8560. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14256-y. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
7
Infraportal bile duct of the caudate lobe: a troublesome anatomic variation in right-sided hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.尾状叶肝门以下胆管:肝门周围胆管癌右侧肝切除术中一个棘手的解剖变异。
Ann Surg. 2007 Nov;246(5):794-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180f633de.
8
Robotic Right Hepatectomy with En Bloc Caudatectomy for Bismuth IIIa Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Video Demonstration of Left-Liver-First Anterior Radical Modular Orthotopic Right Hemihepatectomy.机器人辅助右半肝切除联合尾叶整块切除术治疗 Bismuth IIIa 型肝门部胆管癌:左肝优先前入路左半肝模块化标准右半肝切除术的视频演示
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep;31(9):5636-5637. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15407-5. Epub 2024 May 16.
9
Total Hilar En Bloc Resection with Left Hemihepatectomy and Caudate Lobectomy: a Novel Approach for Treatment of Left-Sided Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma (with Video).整块肝门部胆管、左半肝及尾状叶切除术:一种治疗左侧肝门部胆管癌的新方法(附视频)
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Nov;21(11):1906-1914. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3561-4. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
10
Surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma in the new era: the Asan experience.新时代肝门部胆管癌的外科治疗: 来自首尔峨山医院的经验。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2010 Jul;17(4):476-89. doi: 10.1007/s00534-009-0204-5. Epub 2009 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Perspectives on the Surgical Management of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.肝门部胆管癌外科治疗的现状
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 28;14(9):2208. doi: 10.3390/cancers14092208.
2
Vascular Resection in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.肝门部胆管癌的血管切除
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 21;13(21):5278. doi: 10.3390/cancers13215278.
3
Surgery With Arterial Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.肝门部胆管癌动脉切除手术:系统评价与Meta分析方案

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical strategy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma of the left-side predominance: current role of left trisectionectomy.左优势性肝门部胆管癌的手术策略:左三叶切除术的当前作用。
Ann Surg. 2014 Jun;259(6):1178-85. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000584.
2
Novel en-bloc resection of locally advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma: the Rex recess approach.局部晚期肝门部胆管癌的新型整块切除术:雷克斯隐窝入路。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2014 Feb;13(1):93-7. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(14)60013-8.
3
Proposal to modify the International Union Against Cancer staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinomas.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Oct 5;10(10):e31212. doi: 10.2196/31212.
4
Transhepatic Direct Approach to the "Limit of the Division of the Hepatic Ducts" Leads to a High R0 Resection Rate in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.经肝直接入路至“肝管分叉极限”可使肝门部胆管癌获得较高的R0切除率。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Sep;25(9):2358-2367. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04891-1. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
5
Prognostic Relevance of the Eighth Edition of TNM Classification for Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.第八版TNM分类对切除的肝门周围胆管癌的预后相关性
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 29;9(10):3152. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103152.
6
Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage may be the preferred preoperative drainage method in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.经皮肝穿刺胆道引流术可能是肝门部胆管癌首选的术前引流方法。
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Feb;8(2):E203-E210. doi: 10.1055/a-0990-9114. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
7
Right-side versus left-side hepatectomy for the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a comparative study.右半肝切除术与左半肝切除术治疗肝门部胆管癌的对比研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan 4;18(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1779-1.
8
A simple scoring system to predict early recurrence of Bismuth-Corlette type IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.一种预测Bismuth-Corlette IV型肝门部胆管癌早期复发的简易评分系统。
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2019 Apr 21;7(5):345-353. doi: 10.1093/gastro/goz012. eCollection 2019 Oct.
9
Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio Predicts Resectability and Early Recurrence of Bismuth-Corlette Type IV Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值预测可切除性和毕氏Ⅳ型肝门胆管癌早期复发。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Feb;24(2):330-340. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-04086-9. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
10
Resection for Klatskin tumors: technical complexities and results.肝门部胆管癌切除术:技术复杂性与结果
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Sep 18;3:69. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2018.09.01. eCollection 2018.
建议修改国际抗癌联盟(UICC)肝门部胆管癌分期系统。
Br J Surg. 2014 Jan;101(2):79-88. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9379.
4
Portal vein arterialization: a salvage procedure for a totally de-arterialized liver. The Paul Brousse Hospital experience.门静脉动脉化:一种针对完全去动脉化肝脏的挽救性手术。保罗·布罗斯医院的经验。
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Aug;16(8):723-38. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12200. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
5
Salvage parenchymal liver transection for patients with insufficient volume increase after portal vein occlusion -- an extension of the ALPPS approach.门静脉阻断后肝体积增加不足患者的挽救性肝实质离断术——ALPPS 方法的延伸。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Nov;39(11):1230-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
6
Principles of surgical resection in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.肝门部胆管癌的手术切除原则。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013 Jul 15;5(7):139-46. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v5.i7.139.
7
Simultaneous biliary drainage and portal vein embolization before extended hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: preliminary experience.肝门部胆管癌扩大肝切除术前同期胆道引流与门静脉栓塞:初步经验
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Jun;37(3):698-704. doi: 10.1007/s00270-013-0699-7. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
8
Analysis of the efficacy of portal vein embolization for patients with extensive liver malignancy and very low future liver remnant volume, including a comparison with the associating liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy approach.广泛肝脏恶性肿瘤且未来残余肝脏体积非常低的患者行门静脉栓塞术的疗效分析,包括与联合肝脏离断和门静脉结扎的分期肝切除术的比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jul;217(1):126-33; discussion 133-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
9
Combined portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.联合门静脉切除治疗肝门部胆管癌:荟萃分析比较研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Jun;17(6):1107-15. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2202-9. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
10
Portal vein resection using the no-touch technique with a hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.应用无接触技术行门静脉切除联合肝切除术治疗肝门部胆管癌。
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Jan;16(1):56-61. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12067. Epub 2013 Mar 6.