Snoddy Mark Christopher, Lang Maximilian Frank, An Thomas J, Mitchell Phillip Michael, Grantham William Jeffrey, Hooe Benjamin Scoot, Kay Harrison Ford, Bhatia Ritwik, Thakore Rachel V, Evans Jason Michael, Obremskey William Todd, Sethi Manish Kumar
The Vanderbilt Orthopaedic Institute Center for Health Policy, 1215 21st Avenue South, Suite 4200 Medical Center East, South Tower, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
Int Orthop. 2014 Aug;38(8):1711-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2378-y. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
We evaluated factors influencing re-operation in tension band and plating of isolated olecranon fractures.
Four hundred eighty-nine patients with isolated olecranon fractures who underwent tension band (TB) or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) from 2003 to 2013 were identified at an urban level 1 trauma centre. Medical records were reviewed for patient information and complications, including infection, nonunion, malunion, loss of function or hardware complication requiring an unplanned surgical intervention. Electronic radiographs of these patients were reviewed to identify Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) fracture classification and patients who underwent TB or ORIF.
One hundred seventy-seven patients met inclusion criteria of isolated olecranon fractures. TB was used for fixation in 43 patients and ORIF in 134. No statistical significance was found when comparing complication rates in open versus closed olecranon fractures. In a multivariate analysis, the key factor in outcome was method of fixation. Overall, there were higher rates of infection and hardware removal in the TB compared with the ORIF group.
Our results demonstrate that the dominant factor driving re-operation in isolated olecranon fractures is type of fixation. When controlling for all variables, there is an increased chance of re-operation in patients with TB fixation.
我们评估了影响孤立性鹰嘴骨折张力带固定和钢板固定再手术的因素。
在一家城市一级创伤中心,确定了2003年至2013年期间接受张力带(TB)或切开复位内固定(ORIF)治疗的489例孤立性鹰嘴骨折患者。回顾病历以获取患者信息和并发症情况,包括感染、骨不连、畸形愈合、功能丧失或需要进行计划外手术干预的内固定并发症。对这些患者的电子X光片进行回顾,以确定骨科创伤协会(OTA)骨折分类以及接受TB或ORIF治疗的患者。
177例患者符合孤立性鹰嘴骨折的纳入标准。43例患者采用TB固定,134例采用ORIF固定。比较开放性与闭合性鹰嘴骨折的并发症发生率时,未发现统计学差异。在多变量分析中,结果的关键因素是固定方法。总体而言,与ORIF组相比,TB组的感染率和内固定取出率更高。
我们的结果表明,孤立性鹰嘴骨折再手术的主要驱动因素是固定类型。在控制所有变量时,接受TB固定的患者再手术的可能性增加。