Duttenhoefer Fabian, Mertens Marianne E, Vizkelety Josef, Gremse Felix, Stadelmann Vincent A, Sauerbier Sebastian
Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Department of Experimental Molecular Imaging, Helmholtz-Institute for Biomedical Engineering, RWTH-Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Oct;26(10):1195-202. doi: 10.1111/clr.12430. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
X-ray-based planning and post-implantation assessment of titanium implants is the commonly accepted standard to date. However, new implant materials such as zirconia (ZrO2 ) have become available, and magnetic resonance imaging may be a valuable alternative with these implants. The present in vitro study investigated artifacts produced by titanium and zirconia implants in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and assessed the accuracy of pre-implant planning and post-implantation assessment comparing MRI to standard X-ray-based imaging modalities: Orthopantomogram (OPT), cone beam (CBCT), and computed tomography (CT).
Twelve porcine mandibles were prepared and scanned (MRI, OPT, CBCT, μCT), and bone height above the nerve canal was measured. Specimens were implanted with either two titanium or zirconia implants and rescanned to investigate the influence of implant materials on post-implantation assessment. MRI and μCT artifacts were quantified with implants embedded in gelatin phantoms and porcine specimens.
Compared with CBCT set as standard, μCT, OPT, and MRI showed similar accuracy in pre-op bone height measurements. Post-implantation, while titanium implants induced a strong B0 -field distortion resulting in extensive signal voids, zirconia implants were clearly depictable with only minor distortions.
Excellent contrast, limited artifacts, radiation-free and accurate implant assessment may indicate that MRI is a valuable imaging alternative for zirconia-based implant dentistry.
基于X射线的钛植入物术前规划和植入后评估是目前公认的标准。然而,新型植入材料如氧化锆(ZrO₂)已可供使用,磁共振成像可能是这些植入物的一种有价值的替代方法。本体外研究调查了钛和氧化锆植入物在磁共振成像(MRI)中产生的伪影,并比较了MRI与基于X射线的标准成像方式(曲面断层片(OPT)、锥形束CT(CBCT)和计算机断层扫描(CT))在植入术前规划和植入后评估的准确性。
制备12个猪下颌骨并进行扫描(MRI、OPT、CBCT、显微CT),测量神经管上方的骨高度。标本植入两个钛或氧化锆植入物后再次扫描,以研究植入材料对植入后评估的影响。通过将植入物嵌入明胶模型和猪标本中对MRI和显微CT伪影进行量化。
与作为标准的CBCT相比,显微CT、OPT和MRI在术前骨高度测量中显示出相似的准确性。植入后,钛植入物会引起强烈的B₀场畸变,导致广泛的信号缺失,而氧化锆植入物仅产生轻微畸变,清晰可辨。
良好的对比度、有限的伪影、无辐射且准确的植入物评估表明,MRI可能是基于氧化锆的种植牙学的一种有价值的成像替代方法。