Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, UK.
Addiction. 2014 Oct;109(10):1686-94. doi: 10.1111/add.12634. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
(1) To determine whether measured concentrations of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) in individuals' own cannabis predict their estimates of drug potency and actual titration; and (2) to ascertain if these effects are influenced by frequency of use and cannabis type.
Cross-sectional, naturalistic.
Participants' own homes.
A total of 247 cannabis users in the United Kingdom: 152 'recreational' (1-24 days/month) and 95 'daily' (≥25 days/month).
Participants rated their own cannabis for its potency (1-10) and type ('resin', 'herbal', 'skunk') before smoking it in front of the researcher. The amount of cannabis (g) used in their joints was recorded and an additional sample was analysed for THC and CBD concentrations (%).
THC concentrations were related negatively to the amount of cannabis used [unstandardized regression coefficient: b = -0.009, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.017, -0.002]. Potency estimates were predicted by increasing THC (b = 0.055, 95% CI = 0.020, 0.090) and decreasing CBD (b = -0.160, 95% CI = -0.284, -0.062), and both of these associations were mediated by cannabis type (THC: b = 0.018, 95% CI = 0.006, 0.037; CBD: b = -0.105, 95% CI = -0.198, -0.028). Potency estimates were more reflective of THC as frequency of use increased (b = 0.004, 95% CI = 0.001, 0.007) and were 7.3 times more so in daily (partial r = 0.381) than recreational users (r = 0.052).
When using their own cannabis in a naturalistic setting, people titrate the amount they roll in joints according to concentrations of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) but not cannabidiol (CBD). Recreational users thus show poor understanding of cannabis potency.
(1)确定个体自身大麻中 δ-9-四氢大麻酚(THC)和大麻二酚(CBD)的测量浓度是否预测他们对药物效力的估计和实际滴定;(2)确定这些效应是否受使用频率和大麻类型的影响。
横断面、自然主义。
参与者自己的家。
英国共有 247 名大麻使用者:152 名“娱乐”(1-24 天/月)和 95 名“日常”(≥25 天/月)。
参与者在研究人员面前吸烟前,对自己的大麻进行效力(1-10)和类型(“树脂”、“草药”、“臭鼬”)的评级。他们在烟卷中使用的大麻量(克)被记录下来,并对额外的样本进行 THC 和 CBD 浓度(%)分析。
THC 浓度与使用的大麻量呈负相关[未标准化回归系数:b=-0.009,95%置信区间(CI)=-0.017,-0.002]。效力估计由增加 THC(b=0.055,95% CI=0.020,0.090)和减少 CBD(b=-0.160,95% CI=-0.284,-0.062)预测,这两个关联都由大麻类型介导(THC:b=0.018,95% CI=0.006,0.037;CBD:b=-0.105,95% CI=-0.198,-0.028)。随着使用频率的增加,效力估计更能反映 THC(b=0.004,95% CI=0.001,0.007),并且在日常使用者(偏相关 r=0.381)中是娱乐使用者(r=0.052)的 7.3 倍。
当在自然环境中使用自己的大麻时,人们会根据 δ-9-四氢大麻酚(THC)但不是大麻二酚(CBD)的浓度来调整他们在烟卷中卷的大麻量。因此,娱乐性使用者对大麻的效力理解不佳。