Lambert Initiative for Cannabinoid Therapeutics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Drug Test Anal. 2019 Oct;11(10):1486-1497. doi: 10.1002/dta.2687. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
Point-of-collection testing (POCT) for Δ -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in oral fluid is increasingly used to detect driving under the influence of cannabis (DUIC). However, previous studies have questioned the reliability and accuracy of two commonly used POCT devices, the Securetec DrugWipe 5 s (DW5s) and Dräger DrugTest 5000 (DT5000). In the current placebo controlled, double-blind, crossover study we used liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to accurately quantify cannabinoid concentrations in the oral fluid of 14 participants at various timepoints (10, 60, 120, and 180 minutes) following vaporization of 125 mg of THC-dominant (11% THC; <1% CBD), THC/CBD equivalent (11% THC; 11% CBD) and placebo (<1% THC; <1% CBD) cannabis. At each timepoint, oral fluid was also screened using the DW5s (10 ng/mL THC cut-off) and DT5000 (10 ng/mL THC cut-off). LC-MS/MS analysis showed peak oral fluid THC concentrations at the 10 minute timepoint with a rapid decline thereafter. This trajectory did not differ with THC dominant and THC/CBD equivalent cannabis. With a 10 ng/mL confirmatory cut-off, 5% of DW5s test results were false positives and 16% false negatives. For the DT5000, 10% of test results were false positives and 9% false negatives. Neither the DW5s nor the DT5000 demonstrated the recommended >80% sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Accuracy was lowest at 60 minutes, when THC concentrations were often close to the screening cut-off (10 ng/mL). POCT devices can be useful tools in detecting recent cannabis use; however, limitations should be noted, and confirmatory LC-MS/MS quantification of results is strongly advisable.
口腔液中 Δ -四氢大麻酚(THC)的现场检测(POCT)越来越多地用于检测吸食大麻后的驾车能力(DUIC)。然而,先前的研究对两种常用的 POCT 设备 Securetec DrugWipe 5s(DW5s)和 Dräger DrugTest 5000(DT5000)的可靠性和准确性提出了质疑。在目前这项安慰剂对照、双盲、交叉研究中,我们使用液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS/MS)在参与者吸入 125mg 高 THC 大麻(11% THC;<1% CBD)、THC/CBD 等效物(11% THC;11% CBD)和安慰剂(<1% THC;<1% CBD)后,于 10、60、120 和 180 分钟的不同时间点准确量化了口腔液中的大麻素浓度。在每个时间点,还使用 DW5s(10ng/mL THC 截止值)和 DT5000(10ng/mL THC 截止值)对口腔液进行筛查。LC-MS/MS 分析显示,口腔液中 THC 的峰值浓度出现在 10 分钟时间点,此后迅速下降。这一轨迹与高 THC 大麻和 THC/CBD 等效物大麻没有区别。采用 10ng/mL 确认截止值,DW5s 检测结果有 5%为假阳性,16%为假阴性。对于 DT5000,10%的检测结果为假阳性,9%为假阴性。DW5s 和 DT5000 均未达到>80%的灵敏度、特异性和准确性的推荐标准。在 60 分钟时,准确性最低,此时 THC 浓度往往接近筛查截止值(10ng/mL)。POCT 设备可用于检测近期大麻使用;然而,应该注意到其局限性,并强烈建议对检测结果进行 LC-MS/MS 确证定量。