Coelho Sophie G, Rueda Sergio, Wardell Jeffrey D
Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Canada.
Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada.
Addiction. 2025 Jun;120(6):1167-1181. doi: 10.1111/add.16768. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
To establish the feasibility of using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to estimate total quantities of Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) used across different forms of cannabis, and to assess the predictive validity of THC estimates for predicting acute cannabis-related consequences.
14-day EMA using a smartphone application to assess cannabis use in real time.
Canada.
Targeted sample of n = 42 young adults (59.52% women, mean age 25 years) reporting frequent cannabis use.
Surveys completed immediately prior to cannabis use assessed the quantities, THC content and CBD content of various forms of cannabis to be used in the current session; participants also uploaded photos of the cannabis product labels when available. Surveys administered at fixed times throughout the day (84.81% completion rate) assessed acute cannabis-related consequences.
Participants completed a total of 786 pre-cannabis surveys, of which 79.39% and 77.35% contained sufficient information to calculate total THC and CBD (in milligrams), respectively. High agreement was observed between participant-entered THC and CBD contents and those shown in corresponding photos of cannabis product labels. Aggregating across all products used, participants reported using an average of 141.41 [standard deviation (SD) = 224.62, range = 0.00-2000.00] milligrams of THC (i.e. 28.28 standard five-milligram units) and 7.53 (SD = 34.87, range = 0.00-484.22) milligrams of CBD per day. Multilevel models revealed that participants were more likely to report acute negative consequences following sessions when their estimated THC use was higher than their typical THC use. At the between-person level, participants reporting more THC use on average across sessions were less likely to report negative consequences overall.
Using ecological momentary assessment to estimate total quantities of Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol used across different forms of cannabis appears to be feasible, with preliminary predictive validity for acute negative cannabis-related consequences.
确定使用生态瞬时评估(EMA)来估计不同形式大麻中Δ-9-四氢大麻酚(THC)和大麻二酚(CBD)的总使用量的可行性,并评估THC估计值对预测急性大麻相关后果的预测效度。
使用智能手机应用程序进行为期14天的EMA,以实时评估大麻使用情况。
加拿大。
目标样本为n = 42名经常使用大麻的年轻成年人(59.52%为女性,平均年龄25岁)。
在使用大麻之前立即完成的调查问卷评估了本次使用的各种形式大麻的数量、THC含量和CBD含量;参与者还在可能的情况下上传了大麻产品标签的照片。在一天中的固定时间进行的调查问卷(完成率为84.81%)评估了急性大麻相关后果。
参与者共完成了786份使用大麻前的调查问卷,其中79.39%和77.35%分别包含足够的信息来计算THC和CBD的总量(以毫克为单位)。观察到参与者输入的THC和CBD含量与大麻产品标签相应照片中显示的含量高度一致。汇总所有使用的产品,参与者报告平均每天使用141.41 [标准差(SD)= 224.62,范围 = 0.00 - 2000.00] 毫克的THC(即28.28个标准的五毫克单位)和7.53(SD = 34.87,范围 = 0.00 - 484.22)毫克的CBD。多层次模型显示,当参与者估计的THC使用量高于其典型的THC使用量时,他们在使用大麻后更有可能报告急性负面后果。在个体间层面,平均每次使用大麻报告使用更多THC的参与者总体上报告负面后果的可能性较小。
使用生态瞬时评估来估计不同形式大麻中Δ-9-四氢大麻酚和大麻二酚的总使用量似乎是可行的,对急性大麻相关负面后果具有初步的预测效度。