Suppr超能文献

表示原则:为什么你不能两次表示相同的概念。

Principles of representation: why you can't represent the same concept twice.

机构信息

School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester; Department of Psychology, Lancaster University.

出版信息

Top Cogn Sci. 2014 Jul;6(3):390-406. doi: 10.1111/tops.12097. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

Abstract

As embodied theories of cognition are increasingly formalized and tested, care must be taken to make informed assumptions regarding the nature of concepts and representations. In this study, we outline three reasons why one cannot, in effect, represent the same concept twice. First, online perception affects offline representation: Current representational content depends on how ongoing demands direct attention to modality-specific systems. Second, language is a fundamental facilitator of offline representation: Bootstrapping and shortcuts within the computationally cheaper linguistic system continuously modify representational content. Third, time itself is a source of representational change: As the content of underlying concepts shifts with the accumulation of direct and vicarious experience, so too does the content of representations that draw upon these concepts. We discuss the ramifications of these principles for research into both human and synthetic cognitive systems.

摘要

随着认知的体现理论越来越被形式化和检验,必须谨慎地对概念和表示的性质做出明智的假设。在这项研究中,我们概述了三个原因,说明为什么不能两次有效地表示相同的概念。首先,在线感知会影响离线表示:当前的表示内容取决于正在进行的需求如何将注意力引导到特定于模态的系统。其次,语言是离线表示的基本促进因素:计算成本较低的语言系统中的自举和快捷方式不断修改表示内容。第三,时间本身是表示变化的来源:随着直接和间接经验的积累,基础概念的内容发生变化,因此依赖这些概念的表示内容也会发生变化。我们讨论了这些原则对人类和合成认知系统研究的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验