• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

测试:一种具身、情境化的认知理论。

TEST: a tropic, embodied, and situated theory of cognition.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Northumbria University.

出版信息

Top Cogn Sci. 2014 Jul;6(3):442-60. doi: 10.1111/tops.12024. Epub 2013 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1111/tops.12024
PMID:23616259
Abstract

TEST is a novel taxonomy of knowledge representations based on three distinct hierarchically organized representational features: Tropism, Embodiment, and Situatedness. Tropic representational features reflect constraints of the physical world on the agent's ability to form, reactivate, and enrich embodied (i.e., resulting from the agent's bodily constraints) conceptual representations embedded in situated contexts. The proposed hierarchy entails that representations can, in principle, have tropic features without necessarily having situated and/or embodied features. On the other hand, representations that are situated and/or embodied are likely to be simultaneously tropic. Hence, although we propose tropism as the most general term, the hierarchical relationship between embodiment and situatedness is more on a par, such that the dominance of one component over the other relies on the distinction between offline storage versus online generation as well as on representation-specific properties.

摘要

TEST 是一种基于三个不同的层次化表示特征的知识表示分类法:趋向性、具身性和情境性。趋向性表示特征反映了物理世界对主体形成、重新激活和丰富情境化(即源自主体身体约束)概念表示的能力的约束。所提出的层次结构意味着表示原则上可以具有趋向性特征,而不一定具有情境性和/或具身性特征。另一方面,情境化和/或具身性的表示更有可能同时具有趋向性。因此,虽然我们提出趋向性作为最一般的术语,但具身性和情境性之间的层次关系更为平等,以至于一个组件相对于另一个组件的优势取决于离线存储与在线生成之间的区别以及表示特定的属性。

相似文献

1
TEST: a tropic, embodied, and situated theory of cognition.测试:一种具身、情境化的认知理论。
Top Cogn Sci. 2014 Jul;6(3):442-60. doi: 10.1111/tops.12024. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
2
Language, embodiment, and the cognitive niche.语言、具身性与认知生态位。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Aug;10(8):370-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.06.012. Epub 2006 Jul 14.
3
Toward a deeper understanding of embodiment.迈向对具身认知的更深入理解。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2015 Jun;69(2):159-64. doi: 10.1037/cep0000055.
4
Re-live and learn - Interlocutor-induced elicitation of phenomenal experiences in learning offline.重温与学习——对话者引导下的线下学习中现象学体验的引出
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2015 Dec;119(3):649-60. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
5
Principles of representation: why you can't represent the same concept twice.表示原则:为什么你不能两次表示相同的概念。
Top Cogn Sci. 2014 Jul;6(3):390-406. doi: 10.1111/tops.12097. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
6
The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing.概念加工的语言及具身本质。
Cognition. 2010 Jan;114(1):96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Oct 8.
7
Situated Neural Representations: Solving the Problems of Content.定位神经表征:解决内容问题。
Front Neurorobot. 2022 Apr 14;16:846979. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.846979. eCollection 2022.
8
How do motoric realities shape, and become shaped by, the way people evaluate and select potential courses of action? Toward a unitary framework of embodied decision making.运动现实如何塑造人们评估和选择潜在行动方案的方式,以及如何被这些方式所塑造?迈向具身决策的统一框架。
Prog Brain Res. 2009;174:189-203. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)01316-8.
9
A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content.对具身认知假说的批判性审视以及对概念内容基础的新提议。
J Physiol Paris. 2008 Jan-May;102(1-3):59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.004. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
10
How Abstract (Non-embodied) Linguistic Representations Augment Cognitive Control.抽象(非具身)语言表征如何增强认知控制。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 15;11:1597. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01597. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Action verbs and demonstrative pronouns affect volumetric affordance activation.行为动词和指示代词会影响体积可供性激活。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01783-0.
2
Surface neatness as an index of aesthetic value of everyday objects.作为日常用品美学价值指标的表面整洁度。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 10;16:1578785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1578785. eCollection 2025.
3
Does the Level of Temporal Demand Affect Activation of the Mental Timeline?时间需求水平会影响心理时间线的激活吗?
J Cogn. 2025 May 28;8(1):37. doi: 10.5334/joc.448. eCollection 2025.
4
Issues in Grounded Cognition and How to Solve Them - the Minimalist Account.具身认知中的问题及如何解决这些问题——极简主义解释
J Cogn. 2025 Apr 21;8(1):31. doi: 10.5334/joc.444. eCollection 2025.
5
A SNARC-like effect for visual speed.视觉速度的类空间数字反应编码联合效应
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Apr;87(3):1042-1059. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03012-x. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
6
Writing direction influences the spatial representations of past- and future-tense forms: Evidence from eye tracking.书写方向影响过去时态和将来时态形式的空间表征:来自眼动追踪的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2025 May;53(4):1079-1094. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01633-5. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
7
Invariant representations in abstract concept grounding - the physical world in grounded cognition.抽象概念基础中的不变表示——具身认知中的物理世界。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Dec;31(6):2558-2580. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02522-3. Epub 2024 May 28.
8
Vertical Mental Timeline Is Not Influenced by VisuoSpatial Processing.垂直心理时间线不受视觉空间加工的影响。
Brain Sci. 2024 Feb 17;14(2):184. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14020184.
9
Keeping track of time: Horizontal spatial biases for hours, days, and months. 时间追踪:小时、天和月的水平空间偏向。
Mem Cognit. 2024 May;52(4):894-908. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01508-1. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
10
Embodied Processing at Six Linguistic Granularity Levels: A Consensus Paper.六个语言粒度层次上的具身加工:一篇共识论文。
J Cogn. 2023 Oct 10;6(1):60. doi: 10.5334/joc.231. eCollection 2023.