Geremew Kumlachew, Gedefaw Molla, Dagnew Zewdu, Jara Dube
Migibare Senay Children and Family Support Organization, P.O. Box 269, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Dean of GAMBY College of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box 79, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:572473. doi: 10.1155/2014/572473. Epub 2014 May 7.
Traditional biomass has been the major source of cooking energy for major segment of Ethiopian population for thousands of years. Cognizant of this energy poverty, the Government of Ethiopia has been spending huge sum of money to increase hydroelectric power generating stations.
To assess current levels and correlates of traditional cooking energy sources utilization.
A community based cross-sectional study was conducted employing both quantitative and qualitative approaches on systematically selected 423 households for quantitative and purposively selected 20 people for qualitative parts. SPSS version 16 for windows was used to analyze the quantitative data. Logistic regression was fitted to assess possible associations and its strength was measured using odds ratio at 95% CI. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically.
The study indicated that 95% of households still use traditional biomass for cooking. Those who were less knowledgeable about negative health and environmental effects of traditional cooking energy sources were seven and six times more likely to utilize them compared with those who were knowledgeable (AOR (95% CI) = 7.56 (1.635, 34.926), AOR (95% CI) = 6.68 (1.80, 24.385), resp.). The most outstanding finding of this study was that people use traditional energy for cooking mainly due to lack of the knowledge and their beliefs about food prepared using traditional energy. That means "...people still believe that food cooked with charcoal is believed to taste delicious than cooked with other means."
The majority of households use traditional biomass for cooking due to lack of knowledge and belief. Therefore, mechanisms should be designed to promote electric energy and to teach the public about health effects of traditional cooking energy source.
几千年来,传统生物质一直是埃塞俄比亚大部分人口烹饪能源的主要来源。埃塞俄比亚政府意识到这种能源贫困问题,一直在投入巨额资金增加水力发电站。
评估传统烹饪能源利用的当前水平及其相关因素。
采用基于社区的横断面研究,定量研究系统选取423户家庭,定性研究有目的地选取20人。使用Windows版SPSS 16分析定量数据。采用逻辑回归评估可能的关联,并使用95%置信区间的比值比测量其强度。对定性数据进行主题分析。
研究表明,95%的家庭仍使用传统生物质做饭。对传统烹饪能源的负面健康和环境影响了解较少的人使用这些能源的可能性分别是了解较多者的7倍和6倍(调整后比值比(95%置信区间)分别为7.56(1.635,34.926)和6.68(1.80,24.385))。本研究最突出的发现是,人们主要由于缺乏相关知识以及对使用传统能源烹制食物的观念而使用传统能源做饭。也就是说,“……人们仍然认为用木炭烹制的食物比用其他方式烹制的食物味道更好。”
由于缺乏知识和观念,大多数家庭使用传统生物质做饭。因此,应设计相关机制来推广电能,并向公众传授传统烹饪能源对健康的影响。