Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Apr;37(2):221-41. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x13002793.
Commentators have tended to focus on the conceptual framework of our article, the contrast between genetic and associative accounts of mirror neurons, and to challenge it with additional possibilities rather than empirical data. This makes the empirically focused comments especially valuable. The mirror neuron debate is replete with ideas; what it needs now are system-level theories and careful experiments – tests and testability.
评论员往往倾向于关注我们文章的概念框架，即基因和联想解释镜像神经元之间的对比，并以额外的可能性而不是经验数据来挑战它。这使得专注于经验的评论尤其有价值。镜像神经元的争论充满了各种想法；现在它需要的是系统层面的理论和仔细的实验——测试和可测试性。
