Suppr超能文献

评估高血压治疗依从性工具的制定与验证

Elaboration and validation of instrument to assess adherence to hypertension treatment.

作者信息

Rodrigues Malvina Thaís Pacheco, Moreira Thereza Maria Magalhães, Andrade Dalton Francisco de

机构信息

Colégio Técnico de Teresina, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brasil.

Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Saude Publica. 2014 Apr;48(2):232-40. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2014048005044.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To elaborate and validate an instrument of adherence to treatment for systemic arterial hypertension, based on Item Response Theory.

METHODS

The process of developing this instrument involved theoretical, empirical and analytical procedures. The theoretical procedures included defining the construct of adherence to systemic arterial hypertension treatment, identifying areas involved and preparing the instrument. The instrument underwent semantic and conceptual analysis by experts. The empirical procedure involved the application of the instrument to 1,000 users with systemic arterial hypertension treated at a referral center in Fortaleza, CE, Northeastern Brazil, in 2012.. The analytical phase validated the instrument through psychometric analysis and statistical procedures. The Item Response Theory model used in the analysis was the Samejima Gradual Response model.

RESULTS

Twelve of the 23 items of the original instrument were calibrated and remained in the final version. Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α) was 0.81. Items related to the use of medication when presenting symptoms and the use of fat showed good performance as they were more capable of discriminating individuals who adhered to treatment. To ever stop taking the medication and the consumption of white meat showed less power of discrimination. Items related to physical exercise and routinely following the non-pharmacological treatment had most difficulty to respond. The instrument was more suitable for measuring low adherence to hypertension treatment than high.

CONCLUSIONS

The instrument proved to be an adequate tool to assess adherence to treatment for systemic arterial hypertension since it manages to differentiate individuals with high from those with low adherence. Its use could facilitate the identification and verification of compliance to prescribed therapy, besides allowing the establishment of goals to be achieved.

摘要

目的

基于项目反应理论,阐述并验证一种用于系统性动脉高血压治疗依从性的工具。

方法

开发该工具的过程涉及理论、实证和分析程序。理论程序包括定义系统性动脉高血压治疗依从性的结构、确定所涉及的领域并准备该工具。该工具由专家进行语义和概念分析。实证程序涉及2012年在巴西东北部塞阿拉州福塔莱萨的一个转诊中心,将该工具应用于1000名接受系统性动脉高血压治疗的患者。分析阶段通过心理测量分析和统计程序对该工具进行验证。分析中使用的项目反应理论模型是Samejima渐进反应模型。

结果

原始工具的23个项目中有12个经过校准并保留在最终版本中。克朗巴赫α系数(α)为0.81。与出现症状时使用药物和脂肪摄入相关的项目表现良好,因为它们更能区分坚持治疗的个体。曾经停止服药和白肉消费的区分能力较弱。与体育锻炼和常规遵循非药物治疗相关的项目最难做出反应。该工具更适合测量高血压治疗的低依从性而非高依从性。

结论

该工具被证明是评估系统性动脉高血压治疗依从性的合适工具,因为它能够区分高依从性个体和低依从性个体。它的使用除了有助于确定目标外,还可以促进对规定治疗依从性的识别和核查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/999a/4206136/abfd38f7e8ab/rsp-48-02-0232-g01.jpg

相似文献

1
Elaboration and validation of instrument to assess adherence to hypertension treatment.
Rev Saude Publica. 2014 Apr;48(2):232-40. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2014048005044.
2
[Instrument to measure adherence in hypertensive patients: contribution of Item Response Theory].
Rev Saude Publica. 2013 Jun;47(3):523-30. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2013047004439.
3
Brazilian adaptation of the questionnaire to assess adherence to treatment for arterial hypertension.
Rev Saude Publica. 2013 Apr;47(2):292-300. doi: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047003463.
6
Validation of an instrument to measure adherence to type 2 diabetes management.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Jun;43(3):595-603. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01168-0. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
8
The development and psychometric properties of the bipolar disorders knowledge scale.
J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 1;238:645-650. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.043. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
9
Factors associated with non-adherence to three hypertension self-management behaviors: preliminary data for a new instrument.
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jan;28(1):99-106. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2195-1. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
10
Validity and reliability of a short self-efficacy instrument for hypertension treatment adherence among adults with uncontrolled hypertension.
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jul;104(7):1781-1788. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.029. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric Evaluation of the Core Competencies in Disaster Nursing Scale for Disaster Rescue Nurses in Mainland China.
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Aug 10;2025:9957270. doi: 10.1155/jonm/9957270. eCollection 2025.
2
Spirituality/Religiosity and Adherence to Treatment in Hypertensive Individuals.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025 Feb;122(2):e20240558. doi: 10.36660/abc.20240558.
3
Psychometric properties of the health literacy instrument in Brazil (HLS-EU-BR47).
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 20;24(1):1655. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19108-2.
6
Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Medication Adherence in Cardiovascular Disease: A COSMIN Systematic Review.
Clin Drug Investig. 2022 Nov;42(11):879-908. doi: 10.1007/s40261-022-01199-7. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
8
Care coordination in PMAQ-AB: an Item Response Theory-based analysis.
Rev Saude Publica. 2017;51:87. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051007024. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
9
Effectiveness of Educational Technology in Promoting Quality of Life and Treatment Adherence in Hypertensive People.
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 16;11(11):e0165311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165311. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Hypertension control in brazilian publications.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013 Sep;101(3):e65-73. doi: 10.5935/abc.20130173.
2
[Adherence to drug treatment among registered users in the "HIPERDIA" Program in Teresina in the State of Piauí].
Cien Saude Colet. 2012 Jul;17(7):1885-92. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232012000700028.
3
[Barriers to hypertension treatment].
Rev Bras Enferm. 2011 Nov-Dec;64(6):1038-42. doi: 10.1590/s0034-71672011000600008.
4
Promotion, prevention and arterial hypertension care in Brazil.
Rev Saude Publica. 2012 Jun;46(3):543-50. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102012005000027. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
5
[Development and validation of a multidimensional questionnaire assessing non-adherence to medicines].
Rev Saude Publica. 2008 Aug;42(4):764-7. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102008000400025.
6
Item factor analysis: current approaches and future directions.
Psychol Methods. 2007 Mar;12(1):58-79. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.58.
7
[Determinant factors of therapeutic compliance in elderly hypertensive patients].
Rev Med Chil. 2006 Jan;134(1):65-71. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872006000100009. Epub 2006 Mar 8.
8
Identification of psychosocial factors of noncompliance in hypertensive patients.
J Hum Hypertens. 2006 Jan;20(1):23-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001930.
9
Variations in patients' adherence to medical recommendations: a quantitative review of 50 years of research.
Med Care. 2004 Mar;42(3):200-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000114908.90348.f9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验