• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估高血压治疗依从性工具的制定与验证

Elaboration and validation of instrument to assess adherence to hypertension treatment.

作者信息

Rodrigues Malvina Thaís Pacheco, Moreira Thereza Maria Magalhães, Andrade Dalton Francisco de

机构信息

Colégio Técnico de Teresina, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brasil.

Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Saude Publica. 2014 Apr;48(2):232-40. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2014048005044.

DOI:10.1590/s0034-8910.2014048005044
PMID:24897044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4206136/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To elaborate and validate an instrument of adherence to treatment for systemic arterial hypertension, based on Item Response Theory.

METHODS

The process of developing this instrument involved theoretical, empirical and analytical procedures. The theoretical procedures included defining the construct of adherence to systemic arterial hypertension treatment, identifying areas involved and preparing the instrument. The instrument underwent semantic and conceptual analysis by experts. The empirical procedure involved the application of the instrument to 1,000 users with systemic arterial hypertension treated at a referral center in Fortaleza, CE, Northeastern Brazil, in 2012.. The analytical phase validated the instrument through psychometric analysis and statistical procedures. The Item Response Theory model used in the analysis was the Samejima Gradual Response model.

RESULTS

Twelve of the 23 items of the original instrument were calibrated and remained in the final version. Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α) was 0.81. Items related to the use of medication when presenting symptoms and the use of fat showed good performance as they were more capable of discriminating individuals who adhered to treatment. To ever stop taking the medication and the consumption of white meat showed less power of discrimination. Items related to physical exercise and routinely following the non-pharmacological treatment had most difficulty to respond. The instrument was more suitable for measuring low adherence to hypertension treatment than high.

CONCLUSIONS

The instrument proved to be an adequate tool to assess adherence to treatment for systemic arterial hypertension since it manages to differentiate individuals with high from those with low adherence. Its use could facilitate the identification and verification of compliance to prescribed therapy, besides allowing the establishment of goals to be achieved.

摘要

目的

基于项目反应理论,阐述并验证一种用于系统性动脉高血压治疗依从性的工具。

方法

开发该工具的过程涉及理论、实证和分析程序。理论程序包括定义系统性动脉高血压治疗依从性的结构、确定所涉及的领域并准备该工具。该工具由专家进行语义和概念分析。实证程序涉及2012年在巴西东北部塞阿拉州福塔莱萨的一个转诊中心,将该工具应用于1000名接受系统性动脉高血压治疗的患者。分析阶段通过心理测量分析和统计程序对该工具进行验证。分析中使用的项目反应理论模型是Samejima渐进反应模型。

结果

原始工具的23个项目中有12个经过校准并保留在最终版本中。克朗巴赫α系数(α)为0.81。与出现症状时使用药物和脂肪摄入相关的项目表现良好,因为它们更能区分坚持治疗的个体。曾经停止服药和白肉消费的区分能力较弱。与体育锻炼和常规遵循非药物治疗相关的项目最难做出反应。该工具更适合测量高血压治疗的低依从性而非高依从性。

结论

该工具被证明是评估系统性动脉高血压治疗依从性的合适工具,因为它能够区分高依从性个体和低依从性个体。它的使用除了有助于确定目标外,还可以促进对规定治疗依从性的识别和核查。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/999a/4206136/abfd38f7e8ab/rsp-48-02-0232-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/999a/4206136/abfd38f7e8ab/rsp-48-02-0232-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/999a/4206136/abfd38f7e8ab/rsp-48-02-0232-g01.jpg

相似文献

1
Elaboration and validation of instrument to assess adherence to hypertension treatment.评估高血压治疗依从性工具的制定与验证
Rev Saude Publica. 2014 Apr;48(2):232-40. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2014048005044.
2
[Instrument to measure adherence in hypertensive patients: contribution of Item Response Theory].[测量高血压患者依从性的工具:项目反应理论的贡献]
Rev Saude Publica. 2013 Jun;47(3):523-30. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2013047004439.
3
Brazilian adaptation of the questionnaire to assess adherence to treatment for arterial hypertension.巴西版评估动脉高血压治疗依从性问卷。
Rev Saude Publica. 2013 Apr;47(2):292-300. doi: 10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047003463.
4
The Reasoning and Regulating Medication Adherence Instrument for patients with coronary artery disease: development and psychometric evaluation.冠心病患者用药依从性推理与调节工具:开发与心理测量学评估
J Nurs Meas. 2013;21(1):64-79. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.21.1.64.
5
Reliability and validity of the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication among Portuguese-speaking Brazilian patients with hypertension.巴西葡萄牙语高血压患者用药治疗满意度问卷的信效度研究
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Jul;25(13-14):1931-40. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13282. Epub 2016 May 2.
6
Validation of an instrument to measure adherence to type 2 diabetes management.验证一种用于测量 2 型糖尿病管理依从性的工具。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Jun;43(3):595-603. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01168-0. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
7
Development of a PATIENT-Medication Adherence Instrument (P-MAI) and a HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL-Medication Adherence Instrument (H-MAI) using the nominal group technique.采用名义群体技术开发患者用药依从性量表(P-MAI)和医疗保健专业人员用药依从性量表(H-MAI)。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 11;15(11):e0242051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242051. eCollection 2020.
8
The development and psychometric properties of the bipolar disorders knowledge scale.双相障碍知识量表的编制及心理测量学特性。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 1;238:645-650. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.043. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
9
Factors associated with non-adherence to three hypertension self-management behaviors: preliminary data for a new instrument.与三种高血压自我管理行为不依从相关的因素:新工具的初步数据。
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jan;28(1):99-106. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2195-1. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
10
Validity and reliability of a short self-efficacy instrument for hypertension treatment adherence among adults with uncontrolled hypertension.一项用于评估未经控制的高血压成年患者高血压治疗依从性的简短自我效能工具的有效性和可靠性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jul;104(7):1781-1788. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.029. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric Evaluation of the Core Competencies in Disaster Nursing Scale for Disaster Rescue Nurses in Mainland China.中国大陆灾害救援护士灾害护理核心能力量表的心理测量学评价
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Aug 10;2025:9957270. doi: 10.1155/jonm/9957270. eCollection 2025.
2
Spirituality/Religiosity and Adherence to Treatment in Hypertensive Individuals.高血压患者的精神性/宗教信仰与治疗依从性
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2025 Feb;122(2):e20240558. doi: 10.36660/abc.20240558.
3
Psychometric properties of the health literacy instrument in Brazil (HLS-EU-BR47).

本文引用的文献

1
Hypertension control in brazilian publications.巴西出版物中的高血压控制。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013 Sep;101(3):e65-73. doi: 10.5935/abc.20130173.
2
[Adherence to drug treatment among registered users in the "HIPERDIA" Program in Teresina in the State of Piauí].[皮奥伊州特雷西纳市“高血压综合防治计划(HIPERDIA)”中登记用户的药物治疗依从性]
Cien Saude Colet. 2012 Jul;17(7):1885-92. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232012000700028.
3
[Barriers to hypertension treatment].
Rev Bras Enferm. 2011 Nov-Dec;64(6):1038-42. doi: 10.1590/s0034-71672011000600008.
巴西健康素养工具(HLS-EU-BR47)的心理计量学特性。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 20;24(1):1655. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19108-2.
4
Validity, sensitivity and specificity of a measure of medication adherence instrument among patients taking oral anticoagulants.口服抗凝药物患者用药依从性测量工具的有效性、敏感性和特异性。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2023 Dec;11(6):e01113. doi: 10.1002/prp2.1113.
5
Positive Mental Health Scale (PMHS) in Parents of Children with Cancer: A Psychometric Evaluation Using Item Response Theory.癌症患儿家长的积极心理健康量表(PMHS):基于项目反应理论的心理测量学评估
Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 13;15(10):2744. doi: 10.3390/cancers15102744.
6
Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Medication Adherence in Cardiovascular Disease: A COSMIN Systematic Review.患者报告的心血管疾病药物治疗依从性结局测量指标的测量特性:COSMIN 系统评价。
Clin Drug Investig. 2022 Nov;42(11):879-908. doi: 10.1007/s40261-022-01199-7. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
7
Qualitative Interviews to Support Development and Cognitive Debriefing of the Adelphi Adherence Questionnaire (ADAQ©): A Patient-Reported Measure of Medication Adherence Developed for Use in a Range of Diseases, Treatment Modalities, and Countries.支持阿德尔菲依从性问卷(ADAQ©)开发与认知反馈的定性访谈:一种为多种疾病、治疗方式及国家设计的患者报告的药物依从性测量工具。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Sep 15;16:2579-2592. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S358046. eCollection 2022.
8
Care coordination in PMAQ-AB: an Item Response Theory-based analysis.初级医疗质量改进计划-基本医疗服务(PMAQ-AB)中的照护协调:基于项目反应理论的分析
Rev Saude Publica. 2017;51:87. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051007024. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
9
Effectiveness of Educational Technology in Promoting Quality of Life and Treatment Adherence in Hypertensive People.教育技术对提高高血压患者生活质量及治疗依从性的有效性。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 16;11(11):e0165311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165311. eCollection 2016.
4
Promotion, prevention and arterial hypertension care in Brazil.巴西的促进、预防和动脉高血压护理。
Rev Saude Publica. 2012 Jun;46(3):543-50. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102012005000027. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
5
[Development and validation of a multidimensional questionnaire assessing non-adherence to medicines].[一份评估药物治疗不依从性的多维问卷的开发与验证]
Rev Saude Publica. 2008 Aug;42(4):764-7. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102008000400025.
6
Item factor analysis: current approaches and future directions.项目因素分析:当前方法与未来方向。
Psychol Methods. 2007 Mar;12(1):58-79. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.58.
7
[Determinant factors of therapeutic compliance in elderly hypertensive patients].
Rev Med Chil. 2006 Jan;134(1):65-71. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872006000100009. Epub 2006 Mar 8.
8
Identification of psychosocial factors of noncompliance in hypertensive patients.高血压患者不依从性的社会心理因素识别
J Hum Hypertens. 2006 Jan;20(1):23-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001930.
9
Variations in patients' adherence to medical recommendations: a quantitative review of 50 years of research.患者对医疗建议的依从性差异:对50年研究的定量综述
Med Care. 2004 Mar;42(3):200-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000114908.90348.f9.