Casperd J M, Dunbar R I
Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, P.O. Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK.
Behav Processes. 1996 Aug;37(1):57-65. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(95)00075-5.
Orientational asymmetries of male gelada baboons were assessed to determine visual field preferences during agonistic and post-conflict behaviour using photographic sequences of aggressive interactions and records of facial injuries. Both opponents used their left visual field significantly more frequently than their right during fights, threats and approaches; the degree of left visual field preference varied with the level of negative emotion. During post-conflict behaviour, only the non-retreating animal showed a significant left visual field preference. The observed left visual field preferences appear to indicate a right hemisphere dominance in the processing of emotional information. Other possible causes of the baboons' observed visual field preference (including processing of auditory cues and visuospatial information, lateralised control of the brain over facial expression, and the asymmetrical signalling capacity of the face) are discussed.
通过攻击性互动的照片序列和面部受伤记录,评估雄性狮尾狒狒的方向不对称性,以确定在争斗和冲突后行为中的视野偏好。在战斗、威胁和接近过程中,双方对手使用左视野的频率明显高于右视野;左视野偏好程度随负面情绪水平而变化。在冲突后行为中,只有不撤退的动物表现出明显的左视野偏好。观察到的左视野偏好似乎表明在情绪信息处理方面右半球占主导地位。还讨论了狒狒观察到的视野偏好的其他可能原因(包括听觉线索和视觉空间信息的处理、大脑对面部表情的侧化控制以及面部的不对称信号传递能力)。