• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗病理学家中前列腺腺癌Gleason分级的网络教育前后观察者间的可重复性

Inter-observer reproducibility before and after web-based education in the Gleason grading of the prostate adenocarcinoma among the Iranian pathologists.

作者信息

Abdollahi Alireza, Sheikhbahaei Sara, Meysamie Alipasha, Bakhshandeh Mohammadreza, Hosseinzadeh Hasan

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Acta Med Iran. 2014;52(5):370-4.

PMID:24902017
Abstract

This study was aimed at determining intra and inter-observer concordance rates in the Gleason scoring of prostatic adenocarcinoma, before and after a web-based educational course. In this self-controlled study, 150 tissue samples of prostatic adenocarcinoma are re-examined to be scored according to the Gleason scoring system. Then all pathologists attend a free web-based course. Afterwards, the same 150 samples [with different codes compared to the previous ones] are distributed differently among the pathologists to be assigned Gleason scores. After gathering the data, the concordance rate in the first and second reports of pathologists is determined. In the pre web-education, the mean kappa value of Interobserver agreement was 0.25 [fair agreement]. Post web-education significantly improved with the mean kappa value of 0.52 [moderate agreement]. Using weighted kappa values, significant improvement was observed in inter-observer agreement in higher scores of Gleason grade; Score 10 was achieved for the mean kappa value in post web-education was 0.68 [substantial agreement] compared to 0.25 (fair agreement) in pre web-education. Web-based training courses are attractive to pathologists as they do not need to spend much time and money. Therefore, such training courses are strongly recommended for significant pathological issues including the grading of the prostate adenocarcinoma. Through web-based education, pathologists can exchange views and contribute to the rise in the level of reproducibility. Such programs need to be included in post-graduation programs.

摘要

本研究旨在确定在基于网络的教育课程前后,前列腺腺癌Gleason评分中观察者内和观察者间的一致性率。在这项自我对照研究中,对150份前列腺腺癌组织样本重新进行检查,以根据Gleason评分系统进行评分。然后所有病理学家参加一个免费的网络课程。之后,将相同的150个样本(与之前的样本编码不同)以不同方式分发给病理学家,让他们给出Gleason评分。收集数据后,确定病理学家第一次和第二次报告中的一致性率。在网络教育前,观察者间一致性的平均kappa值为0.25(一致性尚可)。网络教育后显著改善,平均kappa值为0.52(中度一致)。使用加权kappa值,在Gleason分级较高的分数中,观察者间一致性有显著改善;在网络教育后,Gleason评分10分的平均kappa值为0.68(高度一致),而在网络教育前为0.25(一致性尚可)。基于网络的培训课程对病理学家很有吸引力,因为他们不需要花费太多时间和金钱。因此,强烈推荐此类培训课程用于包括前列腺腺癌分级在内的重要病理问题。通过网络教育,病理学家可以交流观点并有助于提高可重复性水平。此类课程需要纳入毕业后课程中。

相似文献

1
Inter-observer reproducibility before and after web-based education in the Gleason grading of the prostate adenocarcinoma among the Iranian pathologists.伊朗病理学家中前列腺腺癌Gleason分级的网络教育前后观察者间的可重复性
Acta Med Iran. 2014;52(5):370-4.
2
Inter/intra-observer reproducibility of Gleason scoring in prostate adenocarcinoma in Iranian pathologists.伊朗病理学家对前列腺腺癌进行Gleason评分的观察者间/观察者内可重复性
Urol J. 2012 Spring;9(2):486-90.
3
Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma among general pathologists.普通病理学家对前列腺腺癌进行Gleason分级的观察者间可重复性。
Indian J Cancer. 2011 Oct-Dec;48(4):488-95. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.92277.
4
A comparison of interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in Japan and the United States.日本与美国前列腺癌Gleason分级观察者间可重复性的比较。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 Aug;129(8):1004-10. doi: 10.5858/2005-129-1004-ACOIRO.
5
Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.利用活检进行前列腺癌 Gleason 分级的自动化深度学习系统:一项诊断研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):233-241. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30739-9. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
6
Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer.前列腺癌Gleason组织学分级的观察者间变异性。
Scand J Urol. 2016 Dec;50(6):420-424. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2016.1206619. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
7
A web-based tutorial improves practicing pathologists' Gleason grading of images of prostate carcinoma specimens obtained by needle biopsy: validation of a new medical education paradigm.基于网络的教程可提高执业病理学家对经针吸活检获得的前列腺癌标本图像的Gleason分级:一种新医学教育模式的验证
Cancer. 2000 Oct 15;89(8):1818-23.
8
Evaluation of the interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma using tissue microarrays.使用组织微阵列评估前列腺腺癌Gleason分级的观察者间再现性。
Hum Pathol. 2003 May;34(5):444-9. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(03)00123-0.
9
The updated grading system of prostate carcinoma: an inter-observer agreement study among general pathologists in an academic practice.前列腺癌更新后的分级系统:学术实践中普通病理学家之间的观察者间一致性研究
APMIS. 2017 Nov;125(11):957-961. doi: 10.1111/apm.12741. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
10
Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists.前列腺癌Gleason分级的观察者间可重复性:泌尿外科病理学家。
Hum Pathol. 2001 Jan;32(1):74-80. doi: 10.1053/hupa.2001.21134.

引用本文的文献

1
Significant Inter- and Intralaboratory Variation in Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide Study of 35,258 Patients in The Netherlands.前列腺癌Gleason分级存在显著的实验室间和实验室内部差异:荷兰一项针对35258名患者的全国性研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Oct 27;13(21):5378. doi: 10.3390/cancers13215378.
2
Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家医学教育电子学习评估:一项系统综述。
Comput Educ. 2020 Feb;145:103726. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103726.