Suppr超能文献

使用组织微阵列评估前列腺腺癌Gleason分级的观察者间再现性。

Evaluation of the interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma using tissue microarrays.

作者信息

De la Taille Alexandre, Viellefond Annick, Berger Nicole, Boucher Eric, De Fromont Marc, Fondimare Alain, Molinié Vincent, Piron Dominique, Sibony Mathilde, Staroz Frédéric, Triller Marie, Peltier Eric, Thiounn Nicolas, Rubin Mark A

机构信息

Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Unviersity H. Mondor, Créteil, France.

出版信息

Hum Pathol. 2003 May;34(5):444-9. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(03)00123-0.

Abstract

The Gleason system is the internationally recognized standard for grading prostate cancer, due mainly to its strong prognostic capability. However, interobserver reproducibility is variable in the community setting. Herein we present a novel approach to evaluating Gleason grading among pathologists using high-density tissue microarrays (TMAs). A CD-ROM containing 537 different TMA spot images of 0.6-mm diameter was sent to 10 genitourinary pathologists in France. The pathologists were expected to score each TMA spot based on their experience evaluating standard prostate biopsies, transurethral resections, and prostatectomy samples. There was no consensus meeting beforehand to agree on how the group would apply the Gleason grading system for this project. Percentage of agreement and kappa value were used to assess the level of agreement. A short questionnaire was sent to assess pathologists' opinion on this new approach to evaluating Gleason grading. An average of 311 images were analyzed (range, 104 to 537; median, 256.5). Four of the pathologists evaluated all 537 images and assigned Gleason grades to 149 images with an overall kappa for interobserver agreement for the exact score between 0.31 and 0.52 and between 0.45 to 0.69 if 3 Gleason categories (</=6, 7, and >7) were used. When 2 categories were considered (</=7 or >7), kappa ranged from 0.58 to 0.83. All pathologists analyzed 104 images. Similar results were obtained with an agreement between 0.28 and 0.54 for the 3 Gleason categories. After finishing this test, 90% of genitourinary pathologists considered this approach useful for resident training and 90% for pathology teaching. We conclude that a Gleason score can be easily assigned to each TMA spot of a 0.6-mm-diameter prostate cancer sample. These data also indicated that using TMA spot images may be a good approach for teaching the Gleason grading system due to the small area of tissue.

摘要

Gleason系统是国际公认的前列腺癌分级标准,主要因其强大的预后评估能力。然而,在社区环境中,不同观察者之间的可重复性存在差异。在此,我们提出一种使用高密度组织微阵列(TMA)评估病理学家之间Gleason分级的新方法。一张包含537个直径为0.6毫米的不同TMA斑点图像的光盘被发送给法国的10位泌尿生殖病理学家。这些病理学家需要根据他们评估标准前列腺活检、经尿道切除术和前列腺切除样本的经验,对每个TMA斑点进行评分。事先没有召开共识会议来商定该小组如何将Gleason分级系统应用于这个项目。使用一致率和kappa值来评估一致程度。发送了一份简短的问卷来评估病理学家对这种评估Gleason分级的新方法的看法。平均分析了311张图像(范围为104至537;中位数为256.5)。其中4位病理学家评估了所有537张图像,并为149张图像分配了Gleason分级,观察者间对于精确评分的总体kappa值在0.31至0.52之间,若使用3个Gleason类别(≤6、7和>7),则在0.45至0.69之间。当考虑2个类别(≤7或>7)时,kappa值在0.58至0.83之间。所有病理学家都分析了104张图像。对于3个Gleason类别,得到了类似的结果,一致率在0.28至0.54之间。完成这项测试后,90%的泌尿生殖病理学家认为这种方法对住院医师培训有用,90%的人认为对病理学教学有用。我们得出结论,对于直径为0.6毫米的前列腺癌样本的每个TMA斑点,可以轻松分配Gleason评分。这些数据还表明,由于组织面积小,使用TMA斑点图像可能是教授Gleason分级系统的一种好方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验