Basaran Karaca, Saydam Funda Akoz, Ersin Idris, Yazar Memet, Aygit Ahmet Cemal
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Bagcilar Research and Training Hospital, Oztopuz cad. Camli konak, Ulus-Besiktas-Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey,
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014 Aug;38(4):718-26. doi: 10.1007/s00266-014-0343-1. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
BACKGROUND: Although the free-nipple breast-reduction technique is essentially an amputation, achieving aesthetic results still is important. The authors present their technique for free nipple-areola complex (NAC) transfer over the superomedial or superior pedicle full-thickness flaps in patients for whom a free-nipple technique is inevitable due to certain risk factors. METHODS: The study included 25 patients who underwent surgery with the aforementioned method for addressing severe gigantomastia. The patients had a mean age of 43 years (range 34-59 years) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 35.8 kg/m(2) (range 28-42 kg/m(2)). During the operation, the NAC was elevated as a full-thickness skin graft, then transposed to the superior or superomedial pedicles, which had been planned previously. The subsequent stages of the operation thus became a Wise-pattern breast reduction. RESULTS: The mean resection per breast was 1,815 g (range 1,620-2,410 g). Breast projection, shape, and areolar pigmentation were assessed during the follow-up visit. One patient experienced a partial loss of the NAC graft, which healed secondarily, and three patients experienced a patchy hypopigmentation of the NAC. Breast projection and conical structure were observed to be preserved during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The modified free-nipple technique aimed to convert the reduction procedure to a technique similar to pedicle methods, yielding successful results during the early phases. The full-thickness flap constructed in this way provides more fullness and a maximum contribution to projection in patients who will inevitably undergo breast reduction with the free-nipple method. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
背景:尽管游离乳头乳房缩小技术本质上是一种切除术,但实现美学效果仍然很重要。作者介绍了他们在因某些风险因素而不可避免要采用游离乳头技术的患者中,通过游离乳头乳晕复合体(NAC)转移至超内侧或上蒂全厚皮瓣上的技术。 方法:该研究纳入了25例行上述手术治疗重度巨乳症的患者。患者平均年龄43岁(范围34 - 59岁),平均体重指数(BMI)为35.8 kg/m²(范围28 - 42 kg/m²)。手术过程中,将NAC作为全厚皮片掀起,然后转移至先前规划好的上蒂或超内侧蒂上。手术的后续阶段就变成了 Wise 术式乳房缩小术。 结果:每侧乳房平均切除量为1815 g(范围1620 - 2410 g)。在随访期间评估乳房突出度、形状和乳晕色素沉着情况。1例患者出现NAC皮瓣部分坏死,经二期愈合,3例患者出现NAC片状色素减退。随访期间观察到乳房突出度和圆锥结构得以保留。 结论:改良游离乳头技术旨在将缩小手术转变为类似于带蒂术式的技术,在早期阶段取得了成功结果。以这种方式构建的全厚皮瓣为不可避免要采用游离乳头法进行乳房缩小的患者提供了更多丰满度,并对乳房突出度有最大贡献。 证据等级IV:本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据等级。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或作者在线指南www.springer.com/00266 。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012-10-9
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017-10
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015-6
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018-6-14
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012-8-31
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024-10