Bryant Christina, Lewis Prudence, Bennell Kim L, Ahamed Yasmin, Crough Denae, Jull Gwendolen A, Kenardy Justin, Nicholas Michael K, Keefe Francis J
C. Bryant, MA(Hons), MA(Clin Psych), PhD, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
P. Lewis, BA, BBus, GradDipEdPsych, MClinPsych, Private Practice, Melbourne, Australia.
Phys Ther. 2014 Oct;94(10):1443-54. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130444. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
Physical therapists are well established as providers of treatments for common, painful, and disabling conditions, such as knee osteoarthritis (OA). Thus, they are well placed to deliver treatments that integrate physical and psychosocial elements. Attention is usually given to outcomes of such programs, but few studies have examined the processes and outcomes of training physical therapists to deliver such treatments.
The aim of this study was to describe the processes in training physical therapists: (1) to deliver a standardized pain coping skills treatment and (2) to evaluate the effectiveness of that training.
This study was an analysis of data relating to therapist performance in a randomized clinical trial.
Eleven physical therapists were trained to deliver a 10-session pain coping skills training program for people with knee OA as part of a randomized controlled trial (N=222). The initial training was provided in a workshop format and included extensive, ongoing supervision by a psychologist and rigorous use of well-defined performance criteria to assess competence. Adherence to the program, ratings of performance, and use of advanced skills were all measured against these criteria in a sample (n=74, 10%) of the audio recordings of the intervention sessions.
Overall, the physical therapists achieved a very high standard of treatment delivery, with 96.6% adherence to the program and mean performance ratings all in the satisfactory range. These results were maintained throughout the intervention and across all sessions.
Only 10% of the delivered sessions were analyzed, and the physical therapists who took part in the study were a self-selected group.
This study demonstrated that a systematic approach to training and accrediting physical therapists to deliver a standardized pain coping skills program can result in high and sustained levels of adherence to the program. Training fidelity was achieved in this group of motivated clinicians, but the supervision provided was time intensive. The data provide a promising indicator of greater potential for psychologically informed practice to be a feature of effective health care.
物理治疗师作为常见、疼痛性和致残性疾病(如膝关节骨关节炎(OA))治疗的提供者已得到充分认可。因此,他们非常适合提供整合了身体和心理社会因素的治疗。此类项目的结果通常受到关注,但很少有研究考察培训物理治疗师提供此类治疗的过程和结果。
本研究的目的是描述培训物理治疗师的过程:(1)提供标准化的疼痛应对技能治疗;(2)评估该培训的效果。
本研究是对一项随机临床试验中治疗师表现相关数据的分析。
作为一项随机对照试验(N = 222)的一部分,11名物理治疗师接受培训,为膝关节OA患者提供为期10节的疼痛应对技能培训项目。初始培训以工作坊形式进行,包括由一名心理学家进行广泛、持续的监督,并严格使用明确的绩效标准来评估能力。在干预课程的音频记录样本(n = 74,10%)中,根据这些标准对项目的依从性、表现评分和高级技能的使用进行了测量。
总体而言,物理治疗师达到了非常高的治疗提供标准,项目依从率为96.6%,平均表现评分均在满意范围内。这些结果在整个干预过程和所有课程中都得以保持。
仅分析了10%的已交付课程,且参与研究的物理治疗师是一个自我选择的群体。
本研究表明,采用系统方法培训和认证物理治疗师以提供标准化的疼痛应对技能项目可导致对该项目的高度且持续的依从性。在这组积极主动的临床医生中实现了培训保真度,但所提供的监督需要大量时间。这些数据为心理知情实践成为有效医疗保健的一个特征提供了一个有前景的指标。