Coronado Rogelio A, Brintz Carrie E, McKernan Lindsey C, Master Hiral, Motzny Nicole, Silva Flavio M, Goyal Parul M, Wegener Stephen T, Archer Kristin R
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Pain Rep. 2020 Sep 23;5(5):e847. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000847. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
Psychologically informed physical therapy (PIPT) blends psychological strategies within a physical therapist's treatment approach for the prevention and management of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Several randomized trials have been conducted examining the efficacy of PIPT compared to standard physical therapy on important patient-reported outcomes of disability, physical function, and pain. In this review, we examine recent trials published since 2012 to describe current PIPT methods, discuss implications from findings, and offer future directions. Twenty-two studies, representing 18 trials, were identified. The studied PIPT interventions included (1) graded activity or graded exposure (n = 6), (2) cognitive-behavioral-based physical therapy (n = 9), (3) acceptance and commitment-based physical therapy (n = 1), and (4) internet-based psychological programs with physical therapy (n = 2). Consistent with prior reviews, graded activity is not superior to other forms of physical activity or exercise. In a few recent studies, cognitive-behavioral-based physical therapy had short-term efficacy when compared to a program of standardized exercise. There is a need to further examine approaches integrating alternative strategies including acceptance-based therapies (ie, acceptance and commitment therapy or mindfulness) or internet-based cognitive-behavioral programs within physical therapy. Although PIPT remains a promising care model, more convincing evidence is needed to support widespread adoption, especially in light of training demands and implementation challenges.
心理导向物理治疗(PIPT)将心理策略融入物理治疗师的治疗方法中,用于预防和管理慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛。已经进行了几项随机试验,比较了PIPT与标准物理治疗在患者报告的残疾、身体功能和疼痛等重要结局方面的疗效。在本综述中,我们研究了自2012年以来发表的近期试验,以描述当前的PIPT方法,讨论研究结果的意义,并提供未来的方向。共识别出22项研究,代表18项试验。所研究的PIPT干预措施包括:(1)分级活动或分级暴露(n = 6),(2)基于认知行为的物理治疗(n = 9),(3)基于接纳与承诺的物理治疗(n = 1),以及(4)基于互联网的心理项目与物理治疗相结合(n = 2)。与之前的综述一致,分级活动并不优于其他形式的体育活动或锻炼。在最近的一些研究中,与标准化运动项目相比,基于认知行为的物理治疗具有短期疗效。有必要进一步研究将替代策略(如基于接纳的疗法,即接纳与承诺疗法或正念)或基于互联网的认知行为项目纳入物理治疗的方法。尽管PIPT仍然是一种有前景的护理模式,但需要更有说服力的证据来支持其广泛应用,特别是考虑到培训需求和实施挑战。