• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物研发:欧盟儿科立法、欧洲药品管理局及其儿科委员会——以青少年黑色素瘤为例

Drug development: EU paediatric legislation, the European Medicines Agency and its Paediatric Committee--adolescents' melanoma as a paradigm.

作者信息

Rose Klaus, Senn Stephen

机构信息

klausrose Consulting, Switzerland.

出版信息

Pharm Stat. 2014 Jul-Aug;13(4):211-3. doi: 10.1002/pst.1623. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1002/pst.1623
PMID:24903307
Abstract

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) website lists all diseases that officially exist in adults only. The class waiver for juvenile melanoma was revoked in 2008 referring to US SEER statistics. This statistical justification is misleading. Melanoma in adolescents is much rarer than claimed by EMA/Paediatric Committee; < 1 ∕ 4 of adolescents with melanoma need systemic treatment; separate efficacy studies are neither medically justified nor feasible. The scarce adolescent patients should be allowed to participate in adult trials. To force companies to investigate them separately turns them into paediatric hostages, to adapt the term therapeutic orphans coined in 1968 by Shirkey. There are now five melanoma Paediatric Investigation Plans (PIPs). Probably none of the PIP-triggered clinical studies will ever be completed; we propose to call them ghost studies. An oncology research network considering a reasonable trial in melanoma, including adolescents, will compete for recruitment with the PIP-triggered trials designed by regulatory tunnel vision and sponsored by companies under EMA-imposed pressure. EMA/Paediatric Committee's territorial enthusiasm ("our patients") damages oncology research.

摘要

欧洲药品管理局(EMA)网站列出了所有仅在成人中正式存在的疾病。2008年,参考美国监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)统计数据,青少年黑色素瘤的类别豁免被撤销。这种统计依据具有误导性。青少年黑色素瘤比EMA/儿科委员会声称的要罕见得多;患有黑色素瘤的青少年中,不到四分之一需要进行全身治疗;单独进行疗效研究在医学上既不合理也不可行。稀少的青少年患者应被允许参加成人试验。用1968年 Shirkey 创造的“治疗孤儿”一词来说,迫使公司对他们进行单独研究,会使他们成为儿科的人质。目前有五项黑色素瘤儿科研究计划(PIPs)。可能由PIP引发的临床研究一项都不会完成;我们建议称它们为幽灵研究。一个考虑在黑色素瘤(包括青少年)方面进行合理试验的肿瘤学研究网络,将与由监管狭隘视野引发、在EMA施加的压力下由公司赞助的PIP引发的试验竞争招募患者。EMA/儿科委员会的地域热情(“我们的患者”)损害了肿瘤学研究。

相似文献

1
Drug development: EU paediatric legislation, the European Medicines Agency and its Paediatric Committee--adolescents' melanoma as a paradigm.药物研发:欧盟儿科立法、欧洲药品管理局及其儿科委员会——以青少年黑色素瘤为例
Pharm Stat. 2014 Jul-Aug;13(4):211-3. doi: 10.1002/pst.1623. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
2
Do the European Medicines Agency Decisions Hurt Pediatric Melanoma Patients?欧洲药品管理局的决定是否伤害了儿童黑色素瘤患者?
Clin Ther. 2017 Feb;39(2):253-265. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
3
European Union pediatric legislation jeopardizes worldwide, timely future advances in the care of children with cancer.欧盟儿科立法危及全球范围内儿童癌症护理的未来及时进展。
Clin Ther. 2014 Feb 1;36(2):163-77. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.01.009.
4
Do Paediatric Investigation Plans (PIPs) Advance Paediatric Healthcare?儿科调查计划(PIPs)能否推动儿科医疗保健的发展?
Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Dec;19(6):515-522. doi: 10.1007/s40272-017-0260-2.
5
The EU paediatric regulation: still a large discrepancy between therapeutic needs and approved paediatric investigation plans.欧盟儿科规定:治疗需求与批准的儿科研究计划之间仍存在较大差距。
Paediatr Drugs. 2014 Oct;16(5):397-406. doi: 10.1007/s40272-014-0082-4.
6
Delays in completion and results reporting of clinical trials under the Paediatric Regulation in the European Union: A cohort study.欧盟《儿童用药规例》下临床试验完成和结果报告的延误:一项队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2018 Mar 1;15(3):e1002520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002520. eCollection 2018 Mar.
7
The European Regulation on medicines for paediatric use.《欧洲儿科用药法规》
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2007 Jun;8(2):177-83. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2007.04.004. Epub 2007 May 30.
8
Enabling Development of Paediatric Medicines in Europe: 10 Years of the EU Paediatric Regulation.推动欧洲儿科药物的研发:欧盟儿科法规实施十年
Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Dec;19(6):505-513. doi: 10.1007/s40272-017-0261-1.
9
Extrapolation in the development of paediatric medicines: examples from approvals for biological treatments for paediatric chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.儿科药物开发中的外推法:以儿童慢性免疫介导的炎症性疾病的生物治疗批准为例。
Arch Dis Child. 2017 Oct;102(10):952-957. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-312259. Epub 2017 May 29.
10
Juvenile animal studies and pediatric drug development: a European regulatory perspective.幼年动物研究与儿科药物开发:欧洲监管视角
Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2011 Aug;92(4):254-60. doi: 10.1002/bdrb.20310. Epub 2011 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Are Regulatory Age Limits in Pediatric Melanoma Justified?小儿黑色素瘤的监管年龄限制合理吗?
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2019 Jan 18;90:113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2019.01.003. eCollection 2019.
2
Pediatric melanoma-The whole (conflicts of interest) story.儿童黑色素瘤——完整的(利益冲突)故事。
Int J Womens Dermatol. 2018 Nov 19;5(2):110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2018.10.020. eCollection 2019 Jun.
3
Do Paediatric Investigation Plans (PIPs) Advance Paediatric Healthcare?儿科调查计划(PIPs)能否推动儿科医疗保健的发展?
Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Dec;19(6):515-522. doi: 10.1007/s40272-017-0260-2.
4
Children with multiple sclerosis should not become therapeutic hostages.患有多发性硬化症的儿童不应成为治疗的人质。
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2016 Sep;9(5):389-95. doi: 10.1177/1756285616656592. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
5
A New Ethical Challenge for Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)/Ethics Committees (ECs) in the Assessment of Pediatric Clinical Trials.机构审查委员会(IRB)/伦理委员会(EC)在评估儿科临床试验中面临的新伦理挑战。
Children (Basel). 2015 May 28;2(2):198-210. doi: 10.3390/children2020198.
6
The contributions of the European Medicines Agency and its pediatric committee to the fight against childhood leukemia.欧洲药品管理局及其儿科委员会在抗击儿童白血病方面所做的贡献。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2015 Nov 5;8:185-205. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S63029. eCollection 2015.