Suppr超能文献

脉冲射频治疗三叉神经痛

Pulsed radiofrequency treatment for trigeminal neuralgia.

作者信息

Chua Nicholas Hai Liang, Halim Willy, Beems Tjemme, Vissers Kris Cp

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, St Anna Hospital, Geldrop, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Spring;1(4):257-61. doi: 10.5812/aapm.3493. Epub 2012 Apr 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment is defined as the delivery of short pulses of radiofrequency via a needle tip, which does not result in an actual thermal lesions. There are mixed views regarding the use of PRF for trigeminal neuralgia (TN). In our opinion, one of the main reasons for the contrasting views is the insufficient PRF dose employed in previous studies. In a recent study on the effects of PRF on resiniferatoxin-induced neuropathic pain in an animal model, the anti-allodynic effects of PRF were significantly greater when the PRF exposure duration was increased from 2 to 6 minutes.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this retrospective study is to report the results for 36 consecutive patients who underwent PRF treatment for TN, for 6 minutes at 45 V at a pulsed frequency of 4 Hz and a pulse width of 10 ms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

For the study, we obtained procedural records of 36 consecutive patients. Their current state of pain was evaluated over a telephonic survey and the post-procedural data at 2, 6, and 12 months were retrieved thereafter from the patient records. The main outcome measure was excellent pain relief (more than 80%), which was assessed at 2, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

The percentages of patients who showed excellent pain relief (> 80% pain relief) at 2, 6, and 12 months were 73.5% (25/34), 61.8% (21/34), and 55.9% (19/34), respectively. The percentages of patients showing satisfactory pain relief (50-80% pain relief) at 2, 6, and 12 months were 14.7% (5/34), 17.6% (6/34), and 17.6% (6/34), respectively, and those of patients showing less than satisfactory pain relief (< 50% pain relief) at 2, 6, and 12 months were 11.8% (4/34), 20.6% (7/34), and 23.5% (8/34), respectively. No complications were reported, and none of the patients required hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

PRF of the trigeminal ganglion should be further evaluated as an alternative treatment method for TN.

摘要

背景

脉冲射频(PRF)治疗是指通过针尖传递短脉冲射频,不会导致实际的热损伤。关于PRF用于治疗三叉神经痛(TN)存在不同观点。我们认为,观点存在差异的主要原因之一是既往研究中使用的PRF剂量不足。在最近一项关于PRF对动物模型中树脂毒素诱导的神经性疼痛影响的研究中,当PRF暴露时间从2分钟增加到6分钟时,PRF的抗痛觉过敏作用显著增强。

目的

这项回顾性研究的主要目的是报告36例连续接受PRF治疗TN的患者的结果,治疗参数为45V、脉冲频率4Hz、脉冲宽度10ms,持续6分钟。

患者与方法

在本研究中,我们获取了36例连续患者的治疗记录。通过电话调查评估他们当前的疼痛状态,并随后从患者记录中检索2、6和12个月时的术后数据。主要结局指标为疼痛缓解良好(超过80%),在2、6和12个月时进行评估。

结果

在2、6和12个月时疼痛缓解良好(疼痛缓解>80%)的患者百分比分别为73.5%(25/34)、61.8%(21/34)和55.9%(19/34)。在2、6和12个月时疼痛缓解满意(疼痛缓解50 - 80%)的患者百分比分别为14.7%(5/34)、17.6%(6/34)和17.6%(6/34),而在2、6和12个月时疼痛缓解不满意(疼痛缓解<50%)的患者百分比分别为11.8%(4/34)、20.6%(7/34)和23.5%(8/34)。未报告并发症,且无一例患者需要住院治疗。

结论

三叉神经节的PRF作为TN的一种替代治疗方法应进一步评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d89/4018717/d297a9d26b3c/aapm-01-257-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验