Associate Professor, School of Global Studies, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, and Honorary Fellow, Centre for South Asian Studies, University of Edinburgh.
Disasters. 2014 Jul;38(3):517-39. doi: 10.1111/disa.12056.
This paper explores the impact of violent conflict in Nepal on the functioning of community forestry user groups (CFUGs), particularly those supported by the Livelihoods and Forestry Programme, funded by the United Kingdom's Department for International Development (DFID). The key questions are: (i) what explains the resilience of CFUGs operating at the time of conflict?; (ii) what institutional arrangements and strategies allowed them to continue working under conflict conditions?; and (iii) what lessons can be drawn for donor-supported development around the world? The study contributes to other research on the everyday experiences of residents of Nepal living in a period of conflict. It suggests that CFUG resilience was the result of the institutional set up of community forestry and the employment of various tactics by the CFUGs. While the institutional design of community forestry (structure) was very important for resilience, it was the ability of the CFUGs to support and use it effectively that was the determining factor in this regard.
本文探讨了尼泊尔暴力冲突对社区林业用户组(CFUG)运作的影响,特别是那些由英国国际发展部(DFID)资助的生计和林业方案支持的 CFUG。主要问题是:(i)在冲突时期运作的 CFUG 的弹性是什么原因造成的?;(ii)是什么制度安排和策略使它们能够在冲突条件下继续工作?;(iii)对于世界各地的捐助者支持的发展,可以得出什么经验教训?本研究有助于了解尼泊尔在冲突时期生活的居民的日常生活经验。它表明,CFUG 的弹性是社区林业的制度安排和 CFUG 采用各种策略的结果。虽然社区林业的制度设计(结构)对弹性非常重要,但 CFUG 支持和有效利用它的能力是这方面的决定性因素。