Eiland R B, Maare C, Sjöström D, Samsøe E, Behrens C F
Department of Oncology, Radiotherapy Research Unit, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK2730 Herlev, Denmark.
Department of Oncology, Radiotherapy Research Unit, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK2730 Herlev, Denmark
J Radiat Res. 2014 Sep;55(5):1002-8. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rru044. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
The aim of this study was to carry out geometric and dosimetric evaluation of the usefulness of a deformable image registration algorithm utilized for adaptive head-and-neck intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Data consisted of seven patients, each with a planning CT (pCT), a rescanning CT (ReCT) and a cone beam CT (CBCT). The CBCT was acquired on the same day (± 1 d) as the ReCT (i.e. at Fraction 17, 18, 23, 24 or 29). The ReCT served as ground truth. A deformed CT (dCT) with structures was created by deforming the pCT to the CBCT. The geometrical comparison was based on the volumes of the deformed, and the manually delineated structures on the ReCT. Likewise, the center of mass shift (CMS) and the Dice similarity coefficient were determined. The dosimetric comparison was performed by recalculating the initial treatment plan on the dCT and the ReCT. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) points and a range of conformity measures were used for the evaluation. We found a significant difference in the median volume of the dCT relative to that of the ReCT. Median CMS values were ∼ 2-5 mm, except for the spinal cord, where the median CMS was 8 mm. Dosimetric evaluation of target structures revealed small differences, while larger differences were observed for organs at risk. The deformed structures cannot fully replace manually delineated structures. Based on both geometrical and dosimetrical measures, there is a tendency for the dCT to overestimate the need for replanning, compared with the ReCT.
本研究的目的是对用于自适应头颈部调强放射治疗的可变形图像配准算法的实用性进行几何和剂量学评估。数据包括7名患者,每名患者均有一个计划CT(pCT)、一个重新扫描CT(ReCT)和一个锥形束CT(CBCT)。CBCT在与ReCT同一天(±1天)采集(即在第17、18、23、24或29分次时)。ReCT作为参考标准。通过将pCT变形至CBCT创建带有结构的变形CT(dCT)。几何比较基于变形后的体积以及ReCT上手动勾画的结构。同样,确定质心移位(CMS)和骰子相似系数。剂量学比较通过在dCT和ReCT上重新计算初始治疗计划来进行。剂量体积直方图(DVH)点和一系列适形度测量用于评估。我们发现dCT的中位数体积相对于ReCT有显著差异。除脊髓外,CMS中位数约为2 - 5毫米,脊髓的CMS中位数为8毫米。靶区结构的剂量学评估显示差异较小,而危及器官的差异较大。变形后的结构不能完全替代手动勾画的结构。基于几何和剂量学测量,与ReCT相比,dCT有高估重新计划需求的趋势。